BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC DÂN LẬP HẢI PHÒNG ------------------------------- ISO 9001 : 2008 KHÓA LUẬN TỐT NGHIỆP NGÀNH: NGOẠI NGỮ HẢI PHÒNG - 2012 1 HAIPHONG PRIVATE UNIVESITY FOREIGN LANGUAGES DEPARTMENT ----------------------------------- GRADUATION PAPER SOME OBSTACLES FACING HPU 2ND YEAR ENGLISH MAJORS IN ENGLISH LISTENING COMPREHENSION AND SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS By: Vu Thi Thu Trang Class: NA1202 Supervisor: Nguyen Thi Quynh Hoa, (M.) HAI PHONG - 2012 2 BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC DÂN LẬP HẢI PHÒNG -------------------------------------- NhiÖm vô ®Ò tµi tèt nghiÖp Sinh viên:. 3 Nhiệm vụ đề tài 1. Nội dung và các yêu cầu cần giải quyết trong nhiệm vụ đề tài tốt nghiệp ( về lý luận, thực tiễn, các số liệu cần tính toán và các bản vẽ). Các số liệu cần thiết để thiết kế, tính toán.
Địa điểm thực tập tốt nghiệp. 4 CÁN BỘ HƯỚNG DẪN ĐỀ TÀI Người hướng dẫn thứ nhất: Họ và tên:. Học hàm, học vị:. Nội dung hướng dẫn:.
Người hướng dẫn thứ hai: Họ và tên:. Học hàm, học vị:. Nội dung hướng dẫn:. Đề tài tốt nghiệp được giao ngày tháng năm 2012 Yêu cầu phải hoàn thành xong trước ngày tháng năm 2012 Đã nhận nhiệm vụ ĐTTN Đã giao nhiệm vụ ĐTTN Sinh viên Người hướng dẫn Hải Phòng, ngày tháng năm 2012 HIỆU TRƯỞNG GS.NGƯT Trần Hữu Nghị 5 PHẦN NHẬN XÉT TÓM TẮT CỦA CÁN BỘ HƯỚNG DẪN 1.
Tinh thần thái độ của sinh viên trong quá trình làm đề tài tốt nghiệp: ……………………………………………………………………………. Đánh giá chất lượng của khóa luận (so với nội dung yêu cầu đã đề ra trong nhiệm vụ Đ.N trên các mặt lý luận, thực tiễn, tính toán số liệu…): ……………………………………………………………………………. Cho điểm của cán bộ hướng dẫn (ghi bằng cả số và chữ): ……………………………………………………………………………. Hải Phòng, ngày ….… năm 2012 Cán bộ hướng dẫn (họ tên và chữ ký) 6 NHẬN XÉT ĐÁNH GIÁ CỦA NGƯỜI CHẤM PHẢN BIỆN ĐỀ TÀI TỐT NGHIỆP 1.
Đánh giá chất lượng đề tài tốt nghiệp về các mặt thu thập và phân tích tài liệu, số liệu ban đầu, giá trị lí luận và thực tiễn của đề tài. Cho điểm của người chấm phản biện : (Điểm ghi bằng số và chữ) Ngày. năm 2012 Người chấm phản biện 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Ms. Nguyen Thi Quynh Hoa for her generous assistance, enthusiastic guidance and constructive supervision throughout my thesis.
Without her help, this graduation paper would not have been completed. I also wish to acknowledge indebtedness to all the teachers at Faculty of Foreign Languages, HPU for their valuable lectures and instructions during the past years, which has helped me much in completing the final task. I am grateful to HPU 2nd year English majors and all the English teachers for their enthusiastic participation in completing my survey questionnaires. Finally yet importantly, I would like to thank my family members who always stand by my side while the work was in process.
Haiphong, July 2012 Student Vu Thi Thu Trang 8 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Table of contents Lists of figures and tables PART I: INTRODUCTION. Aims of the study. The significance of the study. Scope of the study.
Methods of the study. Design of the study. 3 PART II: DEVELOPMENT. 4 CHAPTER 1: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND.
Definition of listening .2 Classification of listening .1 Defining listening comprehension. Listening comprehension process. The stages in listening comprehension. POTENTIAL DIFFICULTIES IN LISTENING COMPREHENSION.
21 CHAPTER 2: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. The setting of the study. Students and their background. Resources and materials.
Instruments for collecting data. Data collection procedure. 25 10 CHAPTER 3: DATA ANALYSIS. Analyzing from the students’ survey questionnaire.1 Years of studying English(Q1) .2 Students’ attitude toward listening skill (Q2&3).
Students’ time allocation for self-study (Q4) .Students’ opinion about their self-collected materials exploited(Q7) .5 Student’s perceptions about their listening difficulties (Q5) .6 Student’s opinions on the materials supplied by the teachers (Q6). 33 Figure 8: Students opinions on the materials supplied by the teachers. Analyzing from the teachers’ survey questionnaire. Teachers’ opinions on students’ competence during their first two years in the university.2 Teachers’ opinions on students’ common difficulties in listening lessons 35 3.3 Teachers’ opinions on the materials supplying to the students(Q3) .4 Teachers’ opinions on the ways to help students improve their listening skill .5 Teachers’ suggestions to the students to enhance their listening competence.
38 CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS, DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Findings and discussions. Overview of the study. Limitations and suggestions for further study.
53 11 LISTS OF FIGURES AND TABLES List of figures Figure 1: Listening comprehension process. 13 Figure 2: Information sources in listening comprehension. 14 Figure 3: Years of studying English. 27 Figure 4: Students’ attitude toward listening skill.
28 Figure 5: Students’ attitude toward how listening important to them. 28 Figure 6: Students’ time allocation for self-study. 29 Figure 7: Students’ opinion about their self-collected materials exploited. 30 Figure 8: Students opinions on the materials supplied by the teachers.
33 Figure 9: Teachers’ opinion on students’ listening competence. 34 Figure 10: Teachers’ opinions on materials applying to the 2nd year English majors. 37 List of Tables Table 1: Students’ perceptions about their listening difficulties. 31 Table 2: Teachers’ opinions on students’ common difficulties in listening lessons.
Rationale Being good at communication in English particularly and in foreign languages generally is the desire of all foreign language learners. However, it requires them to speak and to listen well in which listening seems the most challenging task for 12 every student. In fact, there are many factors affecting the learners in listening acquisition. Consequently, it is very difficult for them to master this skill.
Like students from different universities, the writer has faced many difficulties in listening. With four - year experience in learning the skill and from what her observed in practicing listening of other classmates, it can be found that many students failed in practicing listening skill. Some of them complained that they felt unconfident with listening tasks so they could hardly understand the spoken messages. All these above reasons have inspired the writer to do research on listening skill and as a result, a research title goes as “Some obstacles facing HPU 2nd year English majors in English listening comprehension and suggested solutions” 2.
Aims of the study The study has two main purposes as follows: * Finding out the difficulties encountered by 2nd year English majors in listening comprehension. * Giving solutions to these problems 13 3. Research questions The study is conducted to answer the following questions: * What difficulties do HPU 2nd year English majors face in listening comprehension? * What methods should be used to help HPU English major students overcome their difficulties? 4. The significance of the study Although listening has been one of the most common skills, there are few studies on listening problems and factors affecting listening ability.
The most well known one is done by Boyle (1984) identifying and classifying factors affecting listening comprehension. This thesis is designed to investigate second year English major students’ obstacles and causes of those difficulties especially it is done by a HPU student of English so it can be more subjective and appropriate to the ELT situation in HPU. Scope of the study The study limits itself at finding out the difficulties in learning listening skill of second year English majors. Moreover, the researcher concentrates on studying linguistic problems (vocabulary, grammar, connected speech, stress and intonation, accents, speech rate) and non – linguistic ones (skills, psychology, environment, social and cultural knowledge) accessed in the view of both students and lecturers.
Methods of the study The following methods are employed to collect data for the study: - Quantitive method (Two survey questionnaires were designed with the participants of English teachers and major students at Hai Phong Private University. - Direct observation and conversation 14 The major source of data for the study was students’ survey questionnaire respondents while direct observation and conversation applied with an aim to get more information for any confirmation of the findings. Design of the study This study consists of three main parts: the introduction, the development and the conclusion. Part I: Introduction presents the rationales, aims, research questions, significance, scope, method and design of the study.
Part II: Development is divided into 4 chapters: Chapter 1: Theoretical background - deals with the concepts including listening, types of listening, listening comprehension, listening comprehension process, and potential difficulties in listening comprehension. Chapter 2: Methodology - gives the situation analysis, subjects, and data collection instruments. Chapter 3: Data Analysis – shows the detailed results of the survey and a comprehensive analysis on the data collected. Chapter 4 - Findings, discussions and recommendations – refers to major findings, discussions and offers some recommendations for improving students’ listening comprehension.
Part III is the Conclusion presenting an overview of the study, suggestions for further research and limitations of the study. 15 PART II: DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 1: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 1. Definition of listening Listening is considered one of the most important parts of the oral communication. The term is used in order to make oral communication effective.
There was an idea that “Students spend 20 percent of all school related hours just listening. If television watching and one-half of conversations are included, students spend approximately 50 percent of their waking hours just listening. For those hours spent in the classroom, the amount of listening time can be almost 100 percent.” Obviously, it is believed that listening is a significant and essential area of development in a native language and in a second language; therefore, there have been numerous definitions of listening and listening skill. According to Howatt and Dakin (1974), listening is ability to identify and understand what others are saying.
This process involves understanding a speaker’s accent and pronunciation, the speaker’s grammar and vocabulary and comprehension of meaning. An able listener is capable of doing these four things simultaneously. In addition, Lesley Barker (2001) states that: “Listening, however, is more than just being able to hear and understand what someone else says, listening skills involve etiquette, asking for clarification, showing empathy and providing an appropriate response.” According to Bulletin (1952), listening is one of the fundamental language skills. It's a 16 medium through which children, young people and adults gain a large portion of their education-their information, their understanding of the world and of human affairs, their ideals, sense of values, and their appreciation.
Rubin (1995) conceived listening as an active process in which a listener selects and interprets information, which comes from auditory and visual clues in order to define what is going on and what the speakers are trying to express. Purdy (1991) defined listening as “the active and dynamic process of attending, perceiving, interpreting, remembering and responding to the expressed verbal and non-verbal needs, concerns and information offered by the human beings”. Carol (1993) described listening as a set of activities that involve “the individual’s capacity to apprehend, recognize, discriminate or even ignore”. Wolvin and Coakley (1985) points out that listening is “the process of receiving, attending to and assigning meaning to aural stimuli”.
This definition suggests that listening is a complex, problem-solving skill. The task of listening is more than perception of sound. This view of listening is in accordance with second-language theory which considers listening to spoken language as an active and complex process in which listeners focus on selected aspects of aural input, construct meaning, and relate what they hear to existing knowledge (O’Malley & Chamot, 1989; Byrnes, 1984; Richards, 1985; Holand, 1983).