i The effect of an online collocation dictionary on advanced learners’ use of collocations in L2 writing Dung Thi Phuong Cao Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Education September 2018 ii The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his/her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2018 The University of Leeds and Dung Thi Phuong Cao iii Acknowledgements The completion of this thesis would have been impossible without the guidance, support and encouragement of several people to whom I would like to extend my deepest gratitude for their contribution: First, my deep appreciation and gratitude go to my supervisors, Dr. Richard Badger and Prof.
During this time, you have always provided me with invaluable support, guidance and advice. Your experience and knowledge have added immense value throughout my process of completing this thesis. Second, I would like to thank all my colleagues and supporting staff for helping me with collecting data. Without your support I would not have accomplished the thesis.
Third, I owe thanks also to my British and American colleagues and friends, Sidsell Millerstrom, Kendra Marcus, Peter Traynor, Ben Turner, Laura Grassick, and David Smith, who helped me a lot with the data analysis process. Finally but most importantly, special thanks to my husband for his support, sharing, and care during one of the most difficult times in my life. Thank you for giving me time to write the thesis. To my two children, thanks for being by my side and bringing me happiness and energy to overcome stressful periods.
iv Abstract This doctoral research investigates the effect of the use of the Oxford Online Collocation Dictionary on Vietnamese advanced learners’ collocation use in academic writing and their perceptions of the use of the dictionary as a supportive tool. The study aims to help learners improve their collocation use, especially advanced learners who are expected to enhance their store of vocabulary on their own. This study analysed students’ written texts, questionnaires, observations, and interviews. It was carried out in two phases.
In phase 1, 29 participants’ 350-word essays on an assigned topic were collected as baseline data. Participants were then instructed in the use of the Oxford Online Collocation Dictionary. In phase 2, a second set of essays were collected. Observations and questionnaires were also collected at this stage and 8 participants were chosen for in-depth interviews.
Results showed that the use of this online collocation dictionary as a supportive tool produced some benefits for learners, but these were mainly psychological rather than practical effects. Learners feel confident and assured that they have the tool as a resource. However, their collocation use did not show improvement overall. The study found that learners made mistakes with V-N collocation the most.
The study also found that learners often used the dictionary while doing the writing, with some references to other dictionaries for collocation meaning-checking. The dictionary was highly evaluated as a tool for collocation check-up but some enhancements, mostly of content, need to be made. In particular, it needs to provide learners with the meaning of each group of collocates, and pronunciation description; more examples are also needed to illustrate how collocations are used. v Table of Contents Chapter 1 : INTRODUCTION .1 Background and rationale of the study.2 Context of the study .1 Organization of the Vietnamese education system .2 English in Viet Nam.3 University of Social Sciences and Humanities .4 Admission and English curriculum for English major students .5 Dictionaries for language learning .3 Structure of the thesis .8 Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW .1 The concept of collocation .2 Other linguistic terms referring to collocational phenomenon .3 Identification of collocations in the study .4 The degree of acceptability of the combinations .5 Classification of collocations .6 Classification of collocations in this study .4 Learners’ use of collocations .5 Causes of collocational errors .1 Lack of collocation awareness .2 Cross-linguistic influence .3 Lack of knowledge of collocational properties .6 The role of dictionaries in language learning .1 Dictionary use and vocabulary acquisition .2 Difficulties and problems in dictionary use for production .3 The structure of general and collocation dictionaries .7 Introducing the research questions .8 Previously used research methods .1 Choice of research approach .58 Chapter 3 : RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .2 Research design of this study .1 Observations by Recording Sheets .4 Assessment of students’ collocations in written texts .3 The pilot study.1 Rationale of the pilot study .2 Choice and approach to participants in the pilot study.3 Pilot study procedure .4 Findings from the pilot study .5 Data collection procedures .1 First set of written texts .2 Introducing the dictionary .3 Recording sheets and the second written texts .96 Chapter 4 : DATA ANALYSIS .2 Procedure for extracting and analyzing collocations .1 Collocation analysis from the first set of written texts .2 Collocation analysis from the second set of written texts .3 Analysis of variety in collocational use .4 Questionnaire data analysis .5 Recording sheets analysis .6 Interview data analysis .1 Preparation of data for analysis .2 Choice of thematic analysis .3 Phases of data analysis .2 Types of errors .1 When learners approach the dictionary for help.2 How learners use the dictionary to look for collocations .1 Appropriate use of collocations .2 Variety of collocation use .1 Assessment of satisfaction .3 Assessment on accessibility and ease of use .6 Summary of the chapter .205 Chapter 6 : DISCUSSION OF THE FINDINGS .2 Learners’ collocation use .3 Benefits of the OOCD .4 Suggested strategies for dictionary search .6 Effects of the OOCD on learners’ collocation use .220 Chapter 7 : CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS .2 Overview of the study .3 Contributions of the study .2 Implications for dictionary compilers .5 Limitations of the study .6 Suggestions for future research .234 List of References .236 Appendix 1: Link to access the OOCD .245 Appendix 2: Recording sheets .248 Appendix 4: Interview Questions .250 Appendix 5: Amended recording sheets .251 Appendix 6: First writing .252 Appendix 7: Exercises to become familiar with the OOCD .253 Appendix 8: Collocations in learners’ notebooks .261 Appendix 9: Feedback on writing assignments .262 Appendix 10: Second writing.264 Appendix 11: Judgement of combinations from T12A, T22A by the British and American informants .265 ix List of Tables Table 2.1 Collocations and their frequency in the BNC.1 Questions adapted from recording sheets of Atkins and Varantola .1 Grammatical patterns of collocations .24 Potential strong collocations of text 12A .25 Potential strong collocations of text 22A .26 Number of combinations not meeting the threshold .27 Combinations needing further judgement .28 Final judgement results .29 Distribution of judgement results .30 Distribution of the processed combinations .31 Odd collocations from the first set of essays .32 Distribution of judgement results of the second set of essays .33 Distribution of the processed combinations .34 Odd collocations from the second set of essays .35 Repeatedly-used collocations .36 Distribution of collocations looked up in the OOCD of each student .37: Collocations searched in the OOCD to avoid repetition .38: Words searched by using the OOCD in combination with other dictionaries.39 Phases of thematic analysis .1: Distributions of different types of combinations of each essay .2 Ratio of collocations used and odd collocations .3 Distribution of the types of errors in each collocation pattern .4 Comparison of odd collocations without and with the OOCD support .5: Ratio of odd collocations over collocations used in the first and second set of essays .6: Number of strong collocations (Log Dice >7) in the first and the second essay of each student.7: Distribution of the types of odd collocation in each collocation pattern188 Table 5.8 Students’ satisfaction towards OOCD use .9 Effectiveness of dictionary use .10 Summary of findings from recording sheets .11 Accessibility and ease of use .202 xi List of Figures Figure 4.1 A random concordance page of have and chance .2 Statistics and functions to look for collocation candidates .3 Distribution of odd collocations by patterns of the second set of written texts .4 Initial mind map of themes and sub-themes .5 Mind map of themes and key ideas .1 Distribution of odd collocations by patterns of the first set of written texts .2: Number of odd collocations in the two sets of essays.3: Distribution of combinations from the two sets of essays .4: OOCD search of stress, suffer, difficult .5: The OOCD entry for the word stress .1: Semantic sets of the base decision .2: OOCD search of the word challenge .217 xii List of abbreviations BNC The British National Corpus CALD Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary CALL Computer-assisted language learning CCED Collins COBUILD English Dictionary CDOEL Collins Dictionary of the English Language CIDE Cambridge International Dictionary of English Cloc Locative/Goal Complement Co Object Complement COBUILD The Collins COBUILD Dictionary for Learners of English Cs Subject Complement EFL English as a Foreign Language ESL English as a Second Language FEIs Fixed expressions and Idioms GRE Graduate Record Examination IELTS International English Language Test System LDOCE Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English MOET The Ministry of Education and Training MWEs Multiword expressions OALD Oxford Advanced Learners' Dictionary OALDCE Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English Od Direct Object OHPC Oxford Hector Pilot Corpus Oi Indirect Object OOCD The Oxford Online Collocation Dictionary Op Prepositional Object RS Recording sheets SAT Scholastic Assessment Test USSH The University of Social Sciences and Humanities 1 Chapter 1 : INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background and rationale of the study The pedagogical value of the dictionary as a source of information for language learning, collocations included, has long been emphasized by lexicographers (Wright, 1998; Hornby et al.
Nation (2001) claims that they are helpful in a variety of tasks involving the comprehension and production of a text. General dictionaries, however, as Bogaards (2003) points out, are mainly used for receptive rather than productive purposes. In particular, they are mostly used to find the meanings of unknown words in reading tasks. Learners approach dictionaries much less frequently for productive purposes and once they approach them they mostly seek help with information on spelling; collocation searches in dictionaries are much less common (Harvey and Yuill, 1997; Bogaards, 2003).
Béjoint (1989) argues that dictionaries are not used as expected by the compilers. It seems that despite the efforts of dictionary compilers in recent years to improve the description and presentation of collocational information, language learners remain unaware of this potential resource. This is probably because they lack knowledge about the nature and the importance of collocations (Harvey and Yuill, 1997; Laufer 2010; Atkins and Varantola, 1998; Nesselhauf and Tschichold, 2002) The increasing use of electronic dictionaries in recent years may be because they are more convenient than traditional paper dictionaries (Hartmann, 2001). Although there are some concerns regarding the use of electronic dictionaries for language learning, in particular that information retrieved so quickly and painlessly will be forgotten easily, electronic dictionaries have the advantage of ‘providing the user with almost instant access to a database much larger than a single book’ (Nesi, 1999,p.
Some empirical studies have shown that compared to paper-based dictionaries, electronic dictionaries on CD-ROM or dictionaries linked to World Wide Web sites are more efficient and preferable in a variety of aspects: speed and ease of consultation, quality of information supplied (Laufer and Hill, 2000; Tono, 2001) and encouraging exploratory browsing (Nesi, 2000). 2 It was not until around 1960 that lexicographers started to take specific users’ needs into account in the design of lexicographic resources (Bogaards, 2003). Since then, different kinds of specialized dictionaries focusing either on the scope or the coverage of subject (e. medical or legal dictionaries) or a specific aspect of language (e.
dictionaries of idioms and proverbs) have been compiled.