Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Theses & Dissertations History Summer 1988 Reform and Democracy: British and American Reactions to the French Revolution, 1789-1801 Martha Lingua Wheless Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.edu/history_etds Part of the European History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wheless, Martha L. "Reform and Democracy: British and American Reactions to the French Revolution, 1789-1801" (1988). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, History, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/nstk-k932 https://digitalcommons.edu/history_etds/28 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons.
For more information, please contact digitalcommons@odu. REFORM AND DEMOCRACY: BRITISH AND AMERICAN REACTIONS TO THE FRENCH REVOLUTION, 1789-1801 by Martha Lingua Wheless A. May 1978, Vassar College A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August, 1988 Approved by: Norm an H. Pollock, D irector Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
Further reproduction prohibited without permission. © Copyright by Martha Lingua Wheless 1988 All Rights Reserved Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. This thesis is dedicated to my husband, Glen H.
Wheless and my father, George M. Lingua, because without their help I never would have finished this epic. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
ABSTRACT REFORM AND DEMOCRACY: BRITISH AND AMERICAN REACTIONS TO THE FRENCH REVOLUTION, 1789-1801 Martha Lingua Wheless Old Dominion University, 1988 Director Dr. Pollock The outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789 had a profound effect on the countries of the western world. In Great Britain and America initial reaction to the Revolution was overwhelmingly positive, but as the events in France became increasingly violent opinions began to diverge. This thesis examines the diverse popular reactions to the French Revolution in both Great Britain and America.
The role played by the govern ments of these nations in shaping public opinion is considered, as are the affects of the populaces’ reactions on the governments’ policies, which culminated in the suppression of the parliamentary reform movement in Britain and the victory of Jeffersonian-style democracy in America. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1.
THE PRESS, POLITICS AND PUBLIC OPINION. THE BURKE-PAINE DEBATE. REFORM AND REACTION IN BRITAIN. THE REVOLUTION POLARIZES AMERICAN POLITICS.
THE CONSERVATIVE TRIUMPH: SUPPRESSION OF REFORM AND REBELLION. REBELLION, WAR AND PEACE. 124 iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The tumultuous second half of the eighteenth century saw wars and revo lutions, new forms of government, empires lost and won, and the emergence of earthshaking ideas. There were two inextricably linked events with far- reaching consequences which dominated these years: the American War for Independence and the French Revolution. The American Revolution and con sequent establishment of a republican government provided an example that would later be followed by those who wished to reform the French government. In turn, the events of the French Revolution ;d the conflicting attitudes which it aroused, profoundly affected the political character of the new American republic.
While the American Revolution gave substance to the ideas of a person’s right to life, liberty and property, the French Revolution expanded these ideas to include the equality and fraternity of all men. While certain members of the world community enjoyed the spectacle of King George Ill's discomfiture after the loss of Great Britain’s American colonies, the convulsions of the French, while first a constitutional monarchy and then a republic was established, startled many nations out of their compla cency. The relevance elsewhere of events in France was emphasized by the similarity of social and political conditions which existed throughout Western Europe. Monarchs watched the Revolution’s progress with mingled fascination and horror, concerned that the overthrow of the French king might give their subjects undesirable ideas.
1 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 2 This thesis focuses on how popular reactions to the French Revolution influenced the course of the reform movement in Britain and the growth of a democratic organization in America. The role played by the governments of these nations in shaping public opinion is considered, as arc the affects of the populace’s reactions on the policies of the governments.
The responses of the governments to the perceived threats emanating from France also come under consideration. Although this study examines issues reviewed in greater detail by numerous historians,1 its originality lies in the comparison of British and American reactions to events in France from the outbreak of the Revolution to the fall of William Pitt’s Ministry in Britain and the election of Thomas Jefferson to the Presidency in America. In Britain and America, men who had come to the forefront in the battle over the colonies continued to lead their nations in the divisive 1790s. Included in Britain’s cast of characters were: George HI, the king who walked the fine line of sanity;2 William Pitt, the chief minister, whose work was his life; and, Charles James Fox, head of His Majesty’s loyal Opposition, ardent defender of traditional British liberties, but intensely disliked by the King.
Four Americans dominated the 1790s: George Washington, hero and father- figure, the indispensible man; John Adams, rotund and thin-skinned, but coura geous when the welfare of the nation was at stake; Thomas Jefferson, the philo sopher who envisioned himself as the protector of America’s hard-won liber ties; and Alexander Hamilton, the financial genius and political jtuppetmaster 1 Please see the bibliography for a selected listing o f scholars who have explored British or American opinion on the Revolution. 2 Twentieth-century medical evidence has suggested that George III had an inherited defect in his metabolism known as porphyria. An excess of purple-red pigments in the blood intoxi cated all parts of the nervous system, producing the agonizing pain, excited overactivity, paralysis and delirium that the King suffered from at least four times during his reign. Ida Ma- calpine and Richard Hunter explore the nature of the King’s illness in their book George i ll and the Mad Business (New York: Pantheon, 1970).
However, their arguments for porphyria against insanity are not fully accepted by medical opinion. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 who strove to fashion the new nation in Britain’s image.
These men and thousands like them were passionately interested in world events, as they knew that events occurring in one country could greatly affect other members of their small community of nations. However, not everyone in Britain and America took an active interest in politics. While historians have yet to determine an accurate accounting of the number of men and women who involved themselves in the politics of their nation, evidence suggests that this percentage rose when the government instituted new taxes to finance the cost of a new program—or in Britain’s case, a war-and thereby affected the pocket- books of the majority of citizens. For those interested in events across the Channel, or across the Ocean, newspapers, magazines, pamphlets and letters provided ample information on national and international affairs.
The influence of the press on public opinion, and the governments' use of the press to sway opinion, plays an important role in this study of British and American reactions to the French Revolution. The politically aware read detailed accounts of the gyrations of the various French governments that the Revolution brought forth, formed their opinions and then discussed them with other concerned citizens through their newspapers and correspondence. Pam phlet literature also entered the discussion on the benefits and detriments of the Revolution, with Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France and Thomas Paine’s The Rights o f Man defining the opposing sides of the debate. Both the British and American governments utilized the press in an attempt to shape public attitudes toward their policies, while the factions in opposition used the media to criticize those in power and to place their views before the people.
The happenings in France, beginning with the fall of the Bastille, excited interest and commentary on both sides of the Atlantic. While initial British and ■ -r. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
4 American reactions to the French Revolution were favorable, the accompanying violence soon created divisions in this opinion. Distrust of the influences com ing out of France developed at different rates in Britain and America, with Americans taking longer to see the negative side to the violence in France. But in both nations the waves of the Revolution contributed to the growth of a con servative movement, which both governing parties exploited in order to main tain their hold on the reins of power. This conservative reaction to the Revolu tion greatly influenced the course of the reform movement in Great Britain and the development of democracy in the United States.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER 2 THE PRESS, POLITICS AND PUBLIC OPINION Throughout modem history the power of the press to influence public opinion has been convincingly demonstrated. The press’s reports of events in Revolutionary France aided in shaping the emerging political parties in the infant United States.
Later, William Randolph Hearst’s "yellow journalism" helped to push the United States into the Spanish-American War. The foreign correspondents in Germany before World War II pointed out the dangers of Hitler and Nazism for their readers. The Washington Post unravelled the Watergate scandal leading to the first resignation of an American President. The interrelationship between public opinion, the press and politics has been noticed and used since the mid-eighteenth century.
In Great Britain, Edmund Burke, a member of the House of Commons, in his Thoughts on the Cause o f the Present Discontents (1774), insisted that the people needed to keep a strict watch on the conduct of their representatives to prevent abuses of power. John Wilkes and other British printers agreed with Burke and conse- quendy fought to publish the debates of Parliament in order to reveal the government’s activities to the public. The nation’s intense interest in the proceedings of Parliament caused newspaper proprietors to assert that the parli amentary debates comprised their most important single source of news. However, not everyone agreed with allowing the press to publish the debates.
William Windham, a member of the Commons, argued that daily pub lication of the debates lowered the dignity of the House and fomented 5 itta B S A lB B a b h Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 6 discontent throughout the country. Windham also declared that publication tended to increase Parliament’s responsibility to the public opinion and might lead to the British constitutional monarchy changing from a representative government to a democratic one in which the lower classes could control their betters.1 American patriots, before the start of the War for Independence, used the press to pass information between colonies concerning the "unjust restrictions" placed upon them by the British King.
The adoption of a new Constitution, following the Revolution and the Confederation, convinced many skeptics of the effectiveness of the press, as the newspapers’ publication of the Federalist Papers swayed doubters into accepting the new form of government. Jeffersonians recognized the importance of public opinion early on in their attempt to form a viable political party in the newly constituted government of the United States. Thomas Jefferson felt that the people were to be cherished and not feared and that no government should attempt to check, control or rise above public opinion, but should try to merge with i t Jefferson saw in the mobilization of public opinion a principle vital to republican government.