MINISTRY OF EDUCATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND TRAINING AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT THUYLOI UNIVERSITY PHAM PHU HYDRODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF A NEW MASTER MASTER THESIS Ha Noi - 2016 MINISTRY OF EDUCATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, AND TRAINING AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ‘THUY LOI UNIVERSITY oon Leann PHAM PHU HYDRODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF A NEW MASTER Field: Coastal Engineering and Management Field code : 62580203 MASTER THESIS Supervisor : Assoc. Mai Van Cong DECLARATION I hereby certify that the work which is being presented in this thesis entitled, “Hydrodynamic assessment of a new master plan for Tam Quan port ~ Binh Dinh province” in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the Master of Science in Coastal Engineering and Management, is an authentic record of my own work carried out under supervision of Assoc. Mai Van Cong. ‘The matter embodied in this thesis has not been submitted by me for the award of any other degree or diploma.
Ha Noi, December 15, 2016 Pham Phu ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Implementing thesis study on hydrodynamic regime and sediment transport was a challenge but also an interesting and meaningful work to me. From bottom of my heart, I gratefully acknowledge and give thanks to all individuals who gave me the possibility to complete this master thesis. First of all, I would like to expr my hearty and deepest gratitude to my supervisor ‘Assoc. Mai Van Cong for his patience, timely advices, encouragement and valuable supports.
1 would gratefully thanks to MSe. Nguyen Quang Duc Anh from VINWATER for his constructive comments, providing data, guidance and practical suggestions to help me to accomplish thi study successfully. 1 would like to thank to Assoc, Prof, Dr, Tran Thanh Tung and Prof, Dr. Thieu Quang ‘Tuan who are main co-ordinators of this master program, making value contributions to success in Master course.
Iam very thankful to all lecturers in Thuyloi University as well as Delft University of Technology who imparted their valuable knowledge which support me a lot in doing my thesis. 1 would like to thank sincerely to Assoc, Prof. Do Van Luong — Director and MSc. Do Canh Hao, vice ~ Director of Institute of Education and Applied Sciences central ‘Vietnam who gave me a chance to study this master course 1 would like to thank all my classmates of this MSc course, all of them gave me the ‘wonderful time during the course.
Last but never least, I wish to express my thanks to my organization, my colleagues special thank and love go to my family and my dear parents for their support and encouragertents when I studied. I dedicate this thesis to my family for their inspiration and support throughout my life; this research is simply impossible without you. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ‘TABLE OF CONTENT! LIST OF FIGURE: LIST OF TABLES.2 Objectives ofthe study 3 1.3 Scope of the study 3 1.4 Methods of the study 3 1.6 Chapters outline 4 (CHAPTER 2.1 Overview of fishing ports.1 Concept of fishing ports $ 2.2 Classification offishing ports.3 Highlighted fishing ports in the world and Vietnam.4 Current status of fishery of Binh Dinh province Ũ0 2.2 Overview of hydrodynamics oftidal inlets 155 2.1 Difference between tidal inlets and estuaries 15 2.2 Behaviour and hydrodynamics of a tidal inlet.3 Overview of deposition on tidal Mats 2 2.1 Density currents at estuary areas and deposition in rivers (Cat, 2003).2 Sediment transport and deposition on tidal flats (Verhagen, 1999).4 Overview of the study rea.1 Previous studies in the study area 24 2.2 General information on the existing Tam Quan fishing port 26 24.3 General information on the new master plan of Tam Quan fishing port (EAS, 2016) 29 24.4 Focus of this NHẢy.5 Overview of numerical models and the selection model 35 2.1 Introduction of numerical models 35 2.2 Numerical model selection 35 2.3 Introduction of MIKE 21/3 Coupled Model FM (DHL, 2012) 36 CHAPTER 3. FORMULATION OF PORT DESIGN AND PLANNING CRITERIA & MODEL SET-UP 1 3.1 Formulation of port planning and design criteria, 41 3.1 General principles of planning anchorage area for boats and ships.12 Applied design standards, parameters for Tam Quan port and anchorage areas and its navigation channels 4 3.3 Formulation of port planning and design criteria according to hydrodynamic aspects B 3.2 Natural conditions of Tam Quan fishing port area 46 3.5 Geology and geomorphology conditions 50 3.6 Climatic conditions sỊ 3.3 Model set-up 56 3.1 Steps to set-up the model 56 3.2 Basie model input data.3 Model domain, computational mesh and boundaries.4 Hydrodynamic model parameters 64 3.5 Spectral wave model parameters.6 Sand transport model parameters.4 Model calibration and validation, 68 3.2 Model calibration and validation.
HYDRODYNAMIC ASSESSMENTS OF THE NEW MASTER PLAN FOR TAM QUAN PORT.1 Formulated modeling s narios for hydrodynamic ment of Tam Quan port area 16 4.1 For the existing situation 16 4.2 For the new master plan n 4.3 Model extracted locations.2 Hydrodynamic assessments of Tam Quan port area based on riteri.1 Criterion 1, Avoid flooding in the port Land area 19 4.2 Criterion2, To ensure calm wave condition in the port 84 4. To ensure permissible currents for ship maneuvering 87 4. Avoid deposition to maintain channel depths 94 4.3 Proposal of adjusted measure of the port entrance in order to fulfill port design criteria " "5¬ " "M.1 Proposal of adjusted measure 105 4.2 Analysing the results ofthe adjusted measure 107 4.4 Discussion "16 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION 1. Existing weakness HS 3.
Further researches nọ REFERENCI APPENDICES. APPENDIX A ~ Master plans of Tam Quan fishing port 124 APPENDIX B ~ Results of the simulated scenarios for the exis ing situation.127 APPENDIX C ~ Results of the simulated scenarios for the new master plan.31 APPENDIX D — Results of the simulated scenarios for the adjusted master plan 135 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 Some pictures of Chimbote fishing port in Peru (Google Earth) 8 Figure 2.2 Some pictures of Vladivostok Sea Fishing Port in Russia (Google Earth) .3 The quantity and capacity of ships and boats in the whole province through cách year (IEAS, 2016) 12 Figure 2.4 The quantity and capacity of ships in Hoai Nhon district through the years (EAS, 2016) B Figure 2.5 Some pictures of Quy Nhon fishing port in Binh Dinh province (photographed in November 2015) 4 Figure 2.6 Some pictures of De Gi fishing port in Binh Dinh province (photographed in Match 2015).7 Morphodynamics of seasonally closed coastal inlets at the central coast of ‘Vietnam (Tung, 2015) 18 Figure 2.8 Ebb (E) and flood (E) tidal channels. During flood the water might ‘overshoot the bend leading to flood chutes, this process is schematized by the arrows (Van Veen, 1950) 20 Figure 2.9 Some pictures of Tam Quan fishing port (photographed in November 2012) 27 Figure 2.10 Digitizing the channel route for planned ships (IEAS, 2016) 32 Figure 2.11 The location of Thien Chanh and Go Dai fishing ports 3 Figure 3.1 The altitudes and depths, heights in front of the pier (Giap et al.44 Figure 32 The location of the study area a7 Figure 3.3 Wave roses in the nearshore and offshore of Tam Quan area, “ Figure 3.4 Wave height in the offshore of Tam Quan area from 1988:2013.5 Wave period in the offshore of Tam Quan area from 198822013 5s Figure 3.6 Wave direetion inthe offshore of Tam Quan area from 1988:2013.7 The topographic map of surveyed area (Duc et al, 2015) 58 Figure 3.8 The bathymetry of study area used to simulate in MIKE 21 model.9 Locations and design flood discharge hydrograph (P=5%) at Tam Quan area (Duc et al, 2015) 59 Figure 3.10 Design flood discharge hydrograph (P=5%) at Xuan Thanh bridge and the upstream of Thien Chanh bridge 60 igure 3.11 Wave roses at the border point of deep water wave ofTam Quan area .12 Model domain and computational mesh included triangular and quadrangular elements 6 Figure 3.13 The location of observation stations (background map sourced by Google Earth) 69 Figure 3.14 Comparison between calculated and measured water level at PL 7 Figure 3.15 Comparison between calculated and measured water level at P2 7 Figure 3.16 Comparison between calculated and measured wave height at P4.17 Comparison between calculated and measured wave period at P4.18 Comparison between calculated and measured mean wave characteristic at Pa n Figure 3.19 Comparison between calculated and measured water level at PL T3 igure 3.20 Compari mì between calculated and measured water level at P2 B Figure 3.21 Comparison between calculated and measured wave height at P3, 14 Figure 3.22 Comparison between calculated and measured wave period at P3 4 Figure 3.23 Comparison between calculated and measured mean wave characteristic at P3 75 Figure 4.1 The bathymetry of new master plan and the extracted locations of the results from Mike 21/3 FM model 78 Figure 4.2 Water level in the port area during the flood peak period (at 0:00 AM October 11, 2013) with the existing master plan (T) and the new master plan (B).3 Comparison of water le 1 between SC3_PLO and SC6_PLI at 10 points.4 Significant wave height field in the Southwest monsoon period with the existing master plan (L) and the new master plan (R) 85 Figure 4.5 Significant wave height field in the Northeast monsoon period with the existing master plan (L) and the new master plan (R) 86 Figure 4.6 Spring current field (T) and ebb current field (B) in the Southwest monsoon period with the existing master plan 88 Figure 4.7 Spring current field (T) and ebb current field (B) in the Southwest monsoon period with the new master plan 89 Figure 4.8 Spring current field (T) and ebb current field (B) in the Northeast monsoon period with the existing master plan 9Ị Figure 4.9 Spring current field (T) and ebb current field (B) in the Northeast monsoon period with the new master plan % Figure 4.10 Total bed level change in a month in the Southwest monsoon period with the existing master plan.11 Total bed level change in a month in the Southwest monsoon period with the new master plan 95 Figure 4.12 Total bed level change in a month in the Northeast monsoon period with the existing master plan 9 Figure 4.13 Total bed level change in a month in the Northeast monsoon period with the new master plan 98 Figure 4.14 Total bed level change in the flood season with the existing master plan.15 Total bed level change in the flood season with the new master plan.16 Comparison of bed level change between the existing master plan and the new master plan at 10 cross-sections along the channel routes 103 Figure 4.17 The adjusting plan ground and the main current directions 106 Figure 4.18 Water level in the port area during the flood peak period (at 0:00 AM October 11", 2013) with the adjusted master plan, 107 Figure 4.19 Significant wave height field in the Southwest (L) and Northeast (R) ‘monsoon periods with the adjusted master plan 109 Figure 4.20 Spring current field (T) and ebb current field (B) in the Southwest ‘monsoon period with the adjusted master plan 110 Figure 421 Spring current field (T) and ebb current field (B) in the Northeast ‘monsoon period with the adjusted master pan.22 Total bed level change in a month in the Southwest (T) and Northeast (M) ‘monsoon periods and in the flood season (B) with the adjusted master plan HẠ Figure 4.23 Comparison of bed level change between the new master plan and the adjusted master plan at 03 cross-sections along the AB channel route 14 LIST OF TABLES ‘Table 2.1 The current status of changing ships and boats in the whole province through each year (IEAS, 2016) in ‘Table 2.2 The current status of boats and ships in Hoai Nhon district through the years (IEAS, 2016) 12 Table 2.3 The calculated ship parameters.1 Requirements for calm wave condition in the port basin under Japanese regulations (OCDI, 2002) 45 Table 3.2 The statistic table of the wave parameters in calculating the sediment transport 2 ‘Table 3.