Tác động của kiều hối đến đầu tư trong khu vực Đông và Đông Nam Á

Trường đại học

University of Economics

Chuyên ngành

Development Economics

Người đăng

Ẩn danh

Thể loại

Thesis

2011

97
5
0

Phí lưu trữ

35 Point

Mục lục chi tiết

CERTIFICATION

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

ABSTRACT

CONTENT

LIST OF TABLES

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

1. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1. Structure of the thesis

2. CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1. The concepts of remittance

2.2. Motivation and economic effects of remittances

2.3. Relationship between remittances and investment

3. CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1. Data and variable description

3.2. Description of variables of interest

3.3. Model specification & analytical steps

3.4. Methods of parameter estimations

3.4.1. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimator

3.4.2. Fixed Effect (FE) estimator

3.4.3. Generalized Method of Moments (GMM)

3.4.4. Application of GMM estimator in the thesis corresponding to each specification

4. CHAPTER IV: EMPRICAL RESULTS

4.1. Remittances in East and Southeast Asia

4.2. Investment and economic growth in East and Southeast Asia

4.3. Financial development, openness and lending interest rate in East and Southeast Asia

4.4. Institution quality in East and Southeast Asia

4.5. Bivariate correlation of the variables of interest

4.6. The relationship between remittances and variables of interest

4.7. The relationship between investment and the other variables

4.8. The relationship between financial development and other variables

4.9. Examining the impact of remittances on domestic investment using OLS estimation technique

4.10. Examining the impact of remittances on domestic investment using fixed effect (FE) estimation technique

4.11. Examining the impact of remittances on domestic investment using Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) estimation technique

4.12. Brief discussion about the best model

5. CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION, RECOMMENDATION & LIMITATION

5.1. Limitation and suggestion for further study

APPENDIX

Table A: Descriptive statistics on interested variables without institution quality

Table B: Descriptive statistics on institution quality indicators

Table C: Bivariate correlation of the variables of interest