Phân Tích Diễn Ngôn Bài Phát Biểu Của Tổng Thống Obama Tại Lễ Tốt Nghiệp Học Viện Quân Sự 2010 ...

2015

97
2
0

Phí lưu trữ

35 Point

Mục lục chi tiết

DECLARATION

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ABSTRACT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

LIST OF TABLES IN THE STUDY

LIST OF FIGURES IN THE STUDY

A. PART A: INTRODUCTION

A.1. Rationale

A.2. Aims of the study

A.3. Scope of the study

A.4. Significance of the study

A.5. Method of the study

A.6. Design of the study

B. PART B: DEVELOPMENT

1. CHAPTER 1: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

1.1. An overview of CDA

1.1. What is CDA?

1.2. Major concepts of CDA

1.3. CDA’s approaches and Fairclough framework for CDA

1.4. Van Dijk’s socio-cognitive approach

1.5. Wodark’s discourse-historical approach

1.6. Fairclough’s Hallidayan systemic functional approach

1.7. Norman Fairclough’s framework for CDA

1.8. Explanation

2. CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

2.1. Approach of the study

2.2. Data analysis procedure

3. CHAPTER 3: DATA PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Context of Obama’s speeches at West Point in 2010 and 2014

3.2. Ideologies of President Barack Obama in West Point 2010 and 2014 speeches

3.3. Realization of Obama’s ideologies through his use of Vocabulary in West Point 2010 and 2014 speeches

3.3.1. In terms of using Overwording

3.3.2. In terms of using Antonyms

3.3.3. In terms of using metaphors

3.4. Realization of Obama’s ideologies through his use of Grammar in West Point 2010 and 2014 speeches

3.4.1. In terms of using Pronouns

3.4.2. In terms of using Voices

3.4.3. In terms of Modality

3.5. Realization of Obama’s ideologies through his use of Textual Structure in West Point 2010 and 2014 speeches

3.6. The summary of the findings in the study

3.7. Implications of the study

3.8. Recommendations for further study

REFERENCE

APPENDIX I

APPENDIX II

APPENDIX III

APPENDIX IV

Luận văn thạc sĩ vnu ulis us president barack obamas speeches to 2010 and 2014 cadets at the commencement ceremony of the united states military academy a critical discourse analysis