Syracuse University SURFACE Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Projects Summer 8-9-2017 Politics of Exclusion: An Analysis of the Intersections of Marginalized Identities and the Olympic Industry Emily Bonzagni Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.edu/honors_capstone Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Bonzagni, Emily, "Politics of Exclusion: An Analysis of the Intersections of Marginalized Identities and the Olympic Industry" (2017). Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects.edu/honors_capstone/996 This Honors Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact surface@syr.
Politics of Exclusion: An Analysis of the Intersections of Marginalized Identities and the Olympic Industry © Emily Bonzagni, April 27, 2017 ii Abstract “Politics of Exclusion: An Analysis of the Intersections of Marginalized Identities and the Olympic Industry” analyzes the policing power of the Olympic governing bodies and the media on marginalized athletes in the Olympic Games and the ways in which this system constructs norms of gender, race, class, and sexuality. By employing intersectional, Black feminist, research methods in four case studies over the span of Modern Olympic history, this research centers the stories and experiences of Babe Didrikson, Tidye Pickett, Caster Semenya and Chris Mosier to expose the discriminatory and exclusive practices of the Olympic Industry. The case studies reveal the ways in which the Olympic Industry systematically limits the participation of marginalized athletes and highlight progress toward a truly inclusive Olympic Games. iii Executive Summary “Politics of Exclusion: An Analysis of the Intersections of Marginalized Identities and the Olympic Industry” challenges the policing power of the Olympic Industry that disproportionately disadvantages gender, sexual, and racial minorities.
This has created a culture of exclusion in the Olympic Games. This project centers the histories and stories of marginalized athletes who have broken barriers to pressure the Olympic Movement to be more inclusive. The experiences of Babe Didrikson, Tidye Pickett, Caster Semenya and Chris Mosier deal with a variety of social forces and organizational restrictions that limited their participation in high-level sport. The intersections of each individual’s race, class, gender, and sexuality affect their experiences within the Olympic Industry and high-performance sport.
I analyze each of their experiences to reveal how the Olympic governing bodies limit participation based on heterosexist, misogynistic, classist, and racist logics as well as to highlight progress toward inclusion for marginalized athletes. Identity categories discussed in this research include race, class, and gender. Race is defined in terms of this paper as a socially constructed category which is often reduced to and misunderstood as the pigment of an athlete’s skin tone. Whiteness is constructed as superior and valued above other pigments, while blackness is deeply devalued in a hierarchical social system.
White athletes historically have been afforded more opportunities because of race’s intertwinement to class. Because of this racial hierarchy, white athletes have been given greater access to social, economic, and cultural capital, which further stratifies the races based on their class. In short, historically, white athletes have had greater opportunities to reach the Olympic Games. Gender is traditionally defined as a binary of two socially constructed categories – man and woman – where each gender is assigned specific roles in society and are not expected to iv stray outside of those roles based on their sex assignment at birth.
The two categories of gender and sex are defined in opposition with one another. Men, historically, dominate the public sphere of athletics, while women are not expected to participate in sports, but rather remain in the domestic sphere and raise children. Gender is often conflated with sex, which is a biological term used to categorize males and females based on their anatomy, chromosomes, and hormones. However, in reality, neither gender nor sex exist within a binary system, as there are many overlaps between categories that destabilize them, proving that sex and gender exist within a spectrum.
Intersex athletes are athletes whose reproductive anatomy and chromosomal make-up do not fit in the conventional binary system of male and female. Similarly, trans athletes do not fit within the gender binary because they cross the boundaries of gender and challenge its stability. Trans athletes are athletes whose sexual anatomy does not match their own gender identity. Cis athletes are athletes whose sexual anatomy matches their gender identity in the conventional terms of male/man and female/woman.
These socially constructed categories produce material consequences for marginalized athletes that take the form of structural and institutional oppressions at the intersections of race, gender, sex, and class in the context of the Olympic Games. The case studies of Didrikson, Pickett, Semenya, and Mosier were chosen based on each athlete’s self-identity, time period, and sport in which the athlete participated. All four are track and field athletes. Their identities vary greatly in order to dissect the ways in which Olympic policies affect many different athletes in various ways in their journeys to the Olympic Games.
I analyzed cases from 1932-2016 to illustrate the changes in Olympic policies and the governing bodies’ growth towards inclusivity over time. Didrikson and Pickett were contemporaries and teammates: both were track and field athletes on Team USA for the 1932 Games in Los Angeles. v Both came from working class backgrounds but differed in their racial identity – Didrikson identifies as white woman and Pickett a Black woman. Their experiences at the 1932 Games were very different because of their racial identities.
Caster Semenya is a Black South African sprinter, who was forced to undergo demeaning gender verification tests by the Olympic Industry because she does not conform to traditional ideals of femininity and womanhood. She identifies as an intersex athlete from a working-class background in a historically racialized nation, like the United States. Chris Mosier identifies as a white, trans masculine duathlete. He resisted the Olympic Industry’s classist and transphobic policies which discouraged the participation of trans athletes.
His participation on Team USA challenged the Olympic Industry’s policies and created substantial change for future trans athletes in high-performance sport. This project challenges the Olympic Industry’s construction of gender and sex, which are deeply rooted in racist, classist, and misogynist understandings of the terms man and woman. The Olympic Industry is made up of Olympic governing bodies and the media that all police athletes’ performances both on and off the field. By centering the histories and life experiences of marginalized athletes, this research encourages the Olympic governing bodies to create a more inclusive Olympic Games that abide by the purported values of Olympism: equality and non- discrimination.
By highlighting instances in which the Olympics have discriminated and promoted inequality, this research challenges the Olympic Industry to improve its policies surrounding race, class, sexual and gender identity. vi Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………. iii Executive Summary…………………………. viii Advice to Future Honors Students ………….
1 Organization of the Olympic Industry…. 38 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………… 43 Works Cited.……………………………………………………………… 45 Appendices………………………………………………………………… 51 vii Acknowledgements I wanted to thank my parents who have loved and supported me throughout my entire educational career, constantly pushing me to be the best version of myself. I also want to thank Dr. D – my capstone advisor – who has navigated the crazy world of the Olympics with me and guided me through this oftentimes arduous journey.
I also wanted to thank Himika Bhattacharya for constantly pushing me to make my research more feminist and intersectional. This capstone would never have been finished if it wasn’t for Meg Mistry – thank you for proof reading it, oh so many times, and checking-up on me for the past two years to remind me that my capstone wouldn’t write itself. viii Advice to Future Honors Students Don’t be scared, but don’t wait to get started. It’s not as daunting as it seems.
“How soon ‘not now’ becomes never.” – Martin Luther ix x 1 Introduction Gender, sexual, and racial minority groups have faced intense scrutiny and resistance from the Olympic Industry since the inception of the Modern Olympic Games in 1896. Because of restrictive ideals of femininity, members of Olympic governing bodies saw women, sexual minorities, and people of color competing in the Olympic Games as a threat to gender norms and the future of society. However, by the Second Olympiad in 1900, these oppressed athletes broke through the barriers of sexism, misogyny, heterosexism, and racism into the Olympic arena, some captivating the imaginations of many people. The strictures of femininity enforced by then all-white International Olympic Committee (IOC) and varying National Olympic Committees, still held many women back and limited the participation of women of color, members of the LGBTQ community, and gender nonconforming athletes.
Despite some changes, these patterns of exclusion persist throughout Modern Olympic history. This research intends to bring these hidden histories of the women and minority groups who fought for justice in the sporting world to the forefront, noting both successes and continued barriers in the Olympic Industry. At its inception, the Modern Olympic Games sought to be exclusive to white, upper class men. Pierre de Coubertin, who was a wealthy, white, French national, revived the Olympic Games in 1896 and believed that there was no place for women or minority groups in the Games, based on the Ancient Games, where those groups were also excluded.
Coubertin’s Olympic idea focused on beauty and grace as well as “a strong muscular culture based on chivalrous spirit” (de Coubertin 1908, 109). In 1894, he formed the International Olympic Committee, made up of 15 men – all white – who collectively decided to bar women from the First Olympiad in 1896 (Wamsley 2005, 103). He wrote: “I feel that the Olympic Games must be reserved for men… women cannot claim to outdo men in running, fencing, equestrian events, etc” (de Coubertin 2 2000, 711). However, women resisted his exclusion and established the Women’s Olympics to create a space of inclusion which gained significant popularity (Lenskyj 2012, 68).
de Coubertin, who reigned over the International Olympic Committee in an authoritarian fashion rather than having the body function democratically, felt pressure from the popularity of the Women’s Olympics and allowed women to partake in tennis and golf in the Second Olympiad in 1900 (IOC Factsheet: Women 2016, 1) – two sports which de Coubertin believed upheld the ideals of appropriate femininity by focusing on beauty and grace. The International Olympic Committee “encourag[ed] the celebration of specific brands of masculinity and femininity” (Wamsley 2005, 104). de Coubertin and the International Olympic Committee perpetuated Victorian ideals of femininity and masculinity, where women should be confined to the home and the domestic sphere to raise male athletes, while men should be physically robust and able to provide for their women and future sons. The choice in program to include tennis and golf had an economic and therefore class implication – these were expensive sports that required equipment and court time, thus gearing the Olympics to white, upper-class women.
The IOC’s choice to only involve upper-class and white bodies in the 1896 Olympics has had lasting effects on the integration of other minority groups in the 120-year history of the Games. The IOC implemented strict regulations of dress and behavior of women athletes by Western standards of hegemonic femininity. The Olympics perpetuated “emergent gender ideologies [that are] celebrated through the Olympics by its sport leaders, organizers, the media, spectators, and participants” (Wamsley 2005, 106). The IOC members reflected contemporary ideologies surrounding gender through their policies and the operation of the Olympics, having lasting effects on what the rest of the sporting world deems acceptable for athletes of all genders, 3 races, sexualities and classes.
The early choices of the first International Olympic Committee created a culture of exclusion in the Olympic Industry. Organization of the Olympic Industry To comprehend the role the Olympic Industry plays in policing athletes’ bodies, I begin with a review of the composition of the main Olympic governing bodies.