Cải thiện Đường ống Giáo viên cho Người Da Màu: Ba Bài Nghiên Cứu về Học bổng Giáo viên Thiểu số

Chuyên khảo phân tích Repairing the teacher pipeline for people of color three essays, đánh giá các khía cạnh quan trọng, đề xuất hướng nghiên cứu tiếp theo.

Trường đại học

University of Connecticut

Chuyên ngành

Giáo dục

Người đăng

Ẩn danh

Thể loại

Luận án

2020

186
1
0

Phí lưu trữ

45 Point

Mục lục chi tiết

Acknowledgements

Table of Contents

List of Tables

List of Figures

1. CHƯƠNG 1: Repairing the Teacher Pipeline for People of Color: Evidence from States Adopting Minority Teacher Scholarships

1.1. The Dysfunctional Teacher Pipeline for Individuals of Color

1.2. State Scholarships, Public Service, and Teacher Scholarships

1.3. States’ Approaches to Scholarships

1.3.1. State Merit Scholarships

1.3.2. State Financial Need Scholarships

1.4. Public Service and Scholarships

1.5. The Outcomes of Teaching Scholarships

1.6. Program Description and Context

1.7. Difference-in-Differences Estimates

1.8. Tests of Robustness

1.8.1. Greatest Financial Value Scholarships

1.8.2. Private Higher Education Institutions

1.9. Discussion and Implications

1.9.1. Financial Incentives are not Large Enough

1.9.2. Programs are not Scaled Properly

1.9.3. Programs are Substitutes of State Level Financial Aid Based on Merit or Need

1.9.4. Programs are Adopted in States with Specific Racial-Ethnic Structures

1.10. Procedures for Identifying “Minority Teacher Scholarship” Program States

1.11. Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) Code selection for Teachers and Nursing

2. CHƯƠNG 2: Do Minority Teacher Scholarships Lessen Leaks in the Teacher Pipeline? Evidence Flagship University’s Traditional Teacher Education Program

2.1. Teachers of Color Matter for Schooling

2.2. Entry into the Teacher Pipeline for Individuals of Color

2.3. The Challenges of Unobserved Selection for Identifying Causal Impacts

2.4. Propensity Score Matching

2.5. Alternative Matching Strategies

2.6. Propensity Score Matching Estimates

2.7. Remove GPA Cut-Off Years

2.8. Tests of Differential Associations

2.9. Differential Results by Cohort

2.10. Differential Results by Pre-Teaching Major or Financial Aid Based on Need

2.11. Discussion and Implications

2.12. Procedures for identifying “Minority Teacher Scholarship” Program States

2.13. Common Support and Covariate Balance

3. CHƯƠNG 3: Minority Teacher Scholarships and Employment: A Case Study of Labor Market Outcomes from Flagship University’s Traditional Teacher Education Program

3.1. Financial Aid Incentives for Teaching Service

3.2. Differential Access to Teacher Labor Markets by Race/Ethnicity

3.3. Data Sources and Sample

3.4. Educators or Students of Color

3.5. Predictor of Interest

3.6. Students or Educators of Color

3.7. Discrete Time Survival Analysis Models

3.8. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves

3.9. Racial and Ethnic Match in Schools and MTS Status

3.9.1. Students of Color

3.9.2. Educators of Color

3.10. Limitations, Discussion, and Implications

List of Tables

List of Figures

Tóm tắt

I. Tổng quan về Cải thiện Đường ống Giáo viên cho Người Da Màu

Đường ống giáo viên cho người da màu đang gặp nhiều thách thức. Sự thiếu hụt giáo viên da màu trong hệ thống giáo dục đã trở thành một vấn đề nghiêm trọng. Nghiên cứu cho thấy rằng việc tăng cường sự hiện diện của giáo viên da màu có thể mang lại lợi ích lớn cho học sinh. Học bổng giáo viên thiểu số (MTS) được xem là một giải pháp tiềm năng để cải thiện tình hình này.

1.1. Đường ống giáo viên và vai trò của giáo viên da màu

Giáo viên da màu đóng vai trò quan trọng trong việc tạo ra môi trường học tập đa dạng. Họ không chỉ là hình mẫu cho học sinh mà còn giúp cải thiện kết quả học tập của học sinh da màu.

1.2. Tình hình hiện tại của giáo viên da màu trong giáo dục

Mặc dù số lượng học sinh da màu ngày càng tăng, nhưng số lượng giáo viên da màu lại không tương xứng. Điều này dẫn đến sự thiếu hụt trong việc cung cấp hỗ trợ giáo dục cho học sinh.

II. Vấn đề và Thách thức trong Đường ống Giáo viên cho Người Da Màu

Một trong những thách thức lớn nhất là sự thiếu hụt tài chính cho các ứng viên giáo viên da màu. Nhiều người không thể theo đuổi sự nghiệp giáo dục do chi phí học tập cao. Học bổng giáo viên thiểu số (MTS) có thể giúp giảm bớt gánh nặng tài chính này, nhưng vẫn còn nhiều vấn đề cần giải quyết.

2.1. Rào cản tài chính đối với giáo viên da màu

Chi phí học tập cao là một trong những rào cản lớn nhất đối với giáo viên da màu. Học bổng MTS có thể giúp giảm bớt gánh nặng này, nhưng không phải ai cũng đủ điều kiện nhận.

2.2. Sự phân biệt trong tuyển dụng giáo viên

Nhiều giáo viên da màu gặp khó khăn trong việc tìm kiếm việc làm do sự phân biệt trong tuyển dụng. Điều này cần được giải quyết để đảm bảo cơ hội công bằng cho tất cả ứng viên.

III. Phương pháp và Giải pháp Cải thiện Đường ống Giáo viên

Để cải thiện đường ống giáo viên cho người da màu, cần có các giải pháp toàn diện. Học bổng giáo viên thiểu số (MTS) là một trong những giải pháp hiệu quả. Nghiên cứu cho thấy rằng MTS có thể làm tăng tỷ lệ hoàn thành bằng cấp của giáo viên da màu.

3.1. Học bổng giáo viên thiểu số MTS và tác động của nó

Học bổng MTS đã được chứng minh là có tác động tích cực đến tỷ lệ hoàn thành bằng cấp của giáo viên da màu. Điều này cho thấy rằng hỗ trợ tài chính có thể giúp tăng cường sự hiện diện của giáo viên da màu trong lớp học.

3.2. Các chương trình hỗ trợ khác cho giáo viên da màu

Ngoài MTS, cần có các chương trình hỗ trợ khác như đào tạo nghề và tư vấn nghề nghiệp để giúp giáo viên da màu phát triển sự nghiệp.

IV. Ứng dụng thực tiễn và Kết quả Nghiên cứu về Học bổng Giáo viên Thiểu số

Nghiên cứu cho thấy rằng các bang áp dụng chương trình MTS đã thấy sự gia tăng trong tỷ lệ giáo viên da màu. Điều này cho thấy rằng các chính sách công có thể tạo ra sự khác biệt lớn trong việc cải thiện đường ống giáo viên.

4.1. Kết quả từ các bang áp dụng MTS

Các bang áp dụng MTS đã ghi nhận sự gia tăng trong số lượng giáo viên da màu. Điều này cho thấy rằng các chính sách hỗ trợ tài chính có thể tạo ra tác động tích cực.

4.2. Tác động lâu dài của MTS đối với giáo viên da màu

MTS không chỉ giúp tăng số lượng giáo viên da màu mà còn cải thiện chất lượng giáo dục cho học sinh da màu. Điều này có thể dẫn đến những thay đổi tích cực trong tương lai.

V. Kết luận và Tương lai của Đường ống Giáo viên cho Người Da Màu

Cải thiện đường ống giáo viên cho người da màu là một nhiệm vụ quan trọng. Học bổng giáo viên thiểu số (MTS) là một trong những giải pháp hiệu quả. Tuy nhiên, cần có nhiều nỗ lực hơn nữa để giải quyết các vấn đề còn tồn tại.

5.1. Tầm quan trọng của việc duy trì MTS

Việc duy trì và mở rộng chương trình MTS là cần thiết để đảm bảo rằng giáo viên da màu có thể tiếp tục phát triển sự nghiệp của họ.

5.2. Hướng đi tương lai cho giáo viên da màu

Cần có các chính sách công hỗ trợ mạnh mẽ hơn để đảm bảo rằng giáo viên da màu có thể tham gia vào hệ thống giáo dục một cách công bằng và hiệu quả.

25/07/2025

Trích đoạn nội dung tài liệu

University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 8-19-2020 Repairing the Teacher Pipeline for People of Color: Three Essays on Minority Teacher Scholarships Jeremy Landa University of Connecticut - Storrs, jeremy.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Landa, Jeremy, "Repairing the Teacher Pipeline for People of Color: Three Essays on Minority Teacher Scholarships" (2020).edu/dissertations/2633 Repairing the Teacher Pipeline for People of Color: Three Essays on Minority Teacher Scholarships Jeremy B. University of Connecticut, 2020 Despite near consensus agreement about the importance of increasing the presence of teachers of color in schools, there is limited research on how public policy can solve this problem. Drawing on federal and one university’s teacher education data, this dissertation addresses whether a Minority Teacher Scholarship (MTS) can alter the labor supply of teachers of color. The first essay evaluates whether five states implementing MTS programs increase the proportion of candidates of color earning teacher education bachelor’s degrees.

Using event study and difference-in-differences frameworks, I find that implementing states stabilized the share of Black candidates relative to non-implementing states, a result driven by changes in private institutions and states with the greatest financial value awards. In the second essay, I estimate whether teacher candidates of color in the same program are more likely to complete a degree if receiving MTS aid. Using linear probability and propensity score matching models, I find MTS receipt associated positively with bachelor’s and master’s degree completion for individuals who were observably similar on individual characteristics. The third essay investigates whether teacher candidates of color in the same program university respond MTS awards differentially in the labor market.

Using linear probability and discrete-time survival analysis models, I find that MTS receipt associated positively with public school teaching employment within two years of graduation, and negatively with exiting teaching in a public school for individuals of color from the same program. The three studies provide suggestive evidence that MTS programs benefit individuals and the largest group of people of color in states implementing MTS programs. Repairing the Teacher Pipeline for People of Color: Three Essays on Minority Teacher Scholarships Jeremy B., Wayne State University, 2003 Ed. University of Connecticut, 2017 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut 2020 ii Copyright by Jeremy Benjamin Landa 2020 iii Approval Page Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Repairing the Teacher Pipeline for People of Color: Three Essays on Minority Teacher Scholarships Presented by Jeremy B.

Dissertation Chair and Advisor_____________________________________________________ Morgaen L. Dissertation Committee __________________________________________________________ Shaun M. Dissertation Committee __________________________________________________________ Eric J. Dissertation Committee __________________________________________________________ Ann Traynor, Ed.

Kenny Nienhusser, Ed. University of Connecticut 2020 iv Dedication For Shari, who made this possible. For Oscar and George, who kept me grounded while completing work that is ostensibly maddening. For my family, near and far, whose shoulders I stood on to achieve this feat.

And for Elise. As the first-born, I thought you deserved to be the first doctor in our immediate family. v Acknowledgements I am grateful to my committee whose efforts are the reason I produced a dissertation. To Morgaen Donaldson, who made me a better writer, thinker, and was always willing to provide feedback and guidance despite her busy schedule.

To Shaun Dougherty, whose mentorship and investment in my career has persisted through his own job transition. To Eric Brunner, who responded with patience and support to numerous stream of consciousness methodological questions. To Ann Traynor, who has been an eager broker of data access and provider of practitioner insight for this work. And to Kenny Nienhusser, whose detailed and organized feedback and orientation to criticality has always made me pause and think.

Thanks to my colleagues—in particular to Monique Golden, who helped me survive the first three years of classes, and Daron Cyr, who became a regular thought partner and a provider of feedback on my dissertation writings. Thanks to Sam Kamin, whose presence ensured that I know something about statistics and can use Stata fluently. Thanks to Michael Correl, Chelsea Connery, Alex Lamb, Shannon Holder, Britney Jones, Patricia Virella, and Dave Alexandro whose feedback, cheerleading, and camaraderie sustained me when the requirements felt overwhelming. And to Shari, who took on the bulk of the childcare during the pandemic so that I could reach the finish line in this doctoral journey.

I can’t imagine having done any of this without you, and cannot wait for what the future holds. vi Table of Contents Acknowledgements. v Table of Contents. vi List of Tables.

ix List of Figures. x Chapter 1 Repairing the Teacher Pipeline for People of Color: Evidence from States Adopting Minority Teacher Scholarships. 4 The Dysfunctional Teacher Pipeline for Individuals of Color. 6 State Scholarships, Public Service, and Teacher Scholarships.

7 States’ Approaches to Scholarships. 7 State Merit Scholarships. 7 State Financial Need Scholarships. 8 Public Service and Scholarships.

9 The Outcomes of Teaching Scholarships. 12 Program Description and Context. 35 Difference-in-Differences Estimates. 38 Tests of Robustness.

46 Greatest Financial Value Scholarships. 46 Private Higher Education Institutions. 53 Discussion and Implications. 58 Financial Incentives are not Large Enough.

59 Programs are not Scaled Properly. 60 Programs are Substitutes of State Level Financial Aid Based on Merit or Need. 61 Programs are Adopted in States with Specific Racial-Ethnic Structures. Procedures for Identifying “Minority Teacher Scholarship” Program States.

Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) Code selection for Teachers and Nursing. 72 Chapter 2 Do Minority Teacher Scholarships Lessen Leaks in the Teacher Pipeline? Evidence Flagship University’s Traditional Teacher Education Program. 76 Teachers of Color Matter for Schooling. 78 Entry into the Teacher Pipeline for Individuals of Color.

79 The Challenges of Unobserved Selection for Identifying Causal Impacts. 92 Propensity Score Matching. 93 Alternative Matching Strategies. 96 Propensity Score Matching Estimates.

100 Remove GPA Cut-Off Years. 100 Tests of Differential Associations. 102 Differential Results by Cohort. 102 Differential Results by Pre-Teaching Major or Financial Aid Based on Need.

104 Discussion and Implications. Procedures for identifying “Minority Teacher Scholarship” Program States. Common Support and Covariate Balance. 119 Chapter 3 Minority Teacher Scholarships and Employment: A Case Study of Labor Market Outcomes from Flagship University’s Traditional Teacher Education Program.

124 Financial Aid Incentives for Teaching Service. 126 Differential Access to Teacher Labor Markets by Race/Ethnicity. 135 Data Sources and Sample. 137 Educators or Students of Color.

138 Predictor of Interest. 141 Students or Educators of Color. 149 Discrete Time Survival Analysis Models. 149 Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves.

151 Racial and Ethnic Match in Schools and MTS Status. 153 Students of Color. 153 Educators of Color. 157 Limitations, Discussion, and Implications.

172 ix List of Tables Study 1 Table 1-1. Description of Minority Teacher Scholarships (MTS) 14 Table 1-1 (Continued). Description of Minority Teacher Scholarships (MTS). Proportion of Teacher Education Bachelor's Degrees Conferred by Race/Ethnicity.

Outcomes and Covariates in Baseline Year of Data (1994-1995). Definitions of Variables. Difference-in-Differences Estimates of MTS Program Implementation. Tests of Robustness for Difference-in-Differences Estimates of MTS Program Implementation and the Proportion of Black Teacher Candidates.

Difference-in-Differences Estimates of MTS Programs Association with the Proportion of Black Teacher Candidates. Triple-Difference Estimates of MTS Programs Association with the Proportion of Black Teacher Candidates. Placebo Test for Difference-in-Differences Estimates of MTS Programs Association with the Proportion of Black Teacher or Nursing Candidates. Definitions of Variables for Study of MTS recipients.

Outcomes and Predictors by MTS Recipient Status. Linear Probability Models of MTS Relationship to Degree Attainment. OLS and Propensity Score Matching Estimates of the Relationship Between MTS Award on Recipients’ Degree Attainment. Propensity Score Matching of MTS Award on Recipients Master's Degree Attainment without GPA Selection Cut-off Years.

Differential Test of the Relationship Between MTS Receipt and Degree Attainment by Cohort. Differential Tests for Receiving Financial Aid Based on Need or Pre-Teaching Major by MTS. Propensity Score Balancing of Covariates after matching for Estimating the Relationship Between MTS receipt and Degree Attainment. Hypothesis of the role of Minority Teacher Scholarships in Observed Employment or Exit Activities from the Public Schools.

Outcomes for Teacher Candidates of Color at a Flagship University in a state with an MTS Program. Independent Variables for Teacher Candidates of Color at a Flagship University in a state with an MTS Program. Association Between MTS and Employment within 2 years of Graduation. Discrete Time Survival Analysis of the Association Between MTS and Exit from the Profession.

OLS Regression to Estimate the Association Between Students of Color and MTS Receipt. OLS Regression to Estimate the Association Between Licensed Educators of Color and MTS Receipt. State Level Financial Incentives for Pre- and In-service Teachers. Definitions of Variables for Study of Employment Outcomes for MTS recipients.

174 x List of Figures Study 1 Figure 1-1. States implementing MTS scholarships. Total teacher candidates who completed bachelor’s degrees by year. Total (a) teacher candidates of color, (b) Black, non-Hispanic candidates, (c) Hispanic candidates, and (d) Asian, Native American, Pacific Islander, or multi-race candidates who completed bachelor’s degrees by year.

Proportion of (a) teacher candidates of color, (b) Black, non-Hispanic candidates, (c) Hispanic candidates, and (d) Asian, Native American, Pacific Islander, or multi-race candidates who completed bachelor’s degrees by whether the state ever implemented an MTS program. Event study measuring the proportion of (a) teacher candidates of color, (b) Black, non-Hispanic candidates, (c) Hispanic candidates, and (d) Asian, Native American, Pacific Islander, or multi-race candidates who completed bachelor’s degrees before and after MTS implementation. Event study for the proportion of Black, non-Hispanic candidates who completed bachelor’s degrees in (a) the states with the larger financial value scholarships, and (b) states with smaller financial value scholarship in states implementing an MTS. Event study showing the difference between public and private schooling institutions by the proportion of Black, non-Hispanic candidates who completed bachelor’s degrees in states with MTS programs.

Event study showing the proportion of Black, non-Hispanic candidates who completed (a) teacher education or (b) nursing bachelor’s degrees in states implementing MTS programs. Comparison of Unmatched and Matched Kernel Density Histograms 119 Study 3 Figure 3-1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for exit by MTS status from the public schools from year 1 to year 12 for all master’s degree earning teacher education majors who are individuals of color from the same university’s teacher education program. 152 1 Chapter 1 Repairing the Teacher Pipeline for People of Color: Evidence from States Adopting Minority Teacher Scholarships Over the last 35 years, each state in the U.

has become more racially and ethnically diverse (Lee et al. The racial and ethnic population changes are mirrored by changes within the public schools. The National Center for Education Statistics Common Core of Data shows that across the 50 states and DC, 10,247 local education agencies served an average of 16.9% more students of color in 2018 than in 1988.1 Despite large shifts in students’ racial and ethnic characteristics, the number of teachers of color increased across the country only 8% over a similar time frame (U. Department of Education, 2016).

This suggests, and research confirms, that the system is inequitably designed resulting in differential recruitment into and retention within the teacher pipeline by race and ethnicity of individuals (Lindsay et al. Governments play a major role in solving the underrepresentation of teachers of color in public schools. State governments regulate which programs become teacher preparation providers and the credentials necessary for individuals to become teachers from within different pathways.

Nội dung được bảo vệ bản quyền — Tải xuống đầy đủ