AP English ® Language and Composition: Using Documentary Film as an Introduction to Rhetoric 2008 Curriculum Module © 2008 The College Board. All rights reserved. College Board, Advanced Placement Program, AP, SAT, and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of the College Board. connect to college success is a trademark owned by the College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www. AP® English Language and Composition Curriculum Module: Using Documentary Film as an Introduction to Rhetoric Table of Contents Introduction. Shea Bowie State University Bowie, MD Introducing Rhetorical Analysis Through Documentary Film. Shea Introducing Style Analysis Through Documentary Film.
13 John Golden Grant High School Portland, OR Documentary Film As Propaganda. Stevenson High School Lincolnshire, IL Recognizing Fallacies, Bias, and Visual Arguments in Popular Documentaries. 38 Jennifer Pust Santa Monica High School Santa Monica, CA Synthesis on the Screen: Why We Fight. 55 John Brassil College Board Advisor for AP English Language & Composition Mt.
Ararat High School Topsham, ME Contributors………………………………………………61 Curriculum Module: Using Documentary Film as an Introduction to Rhetoric Using Documentary Film as an Introduction to Rhetoric Introduction to Documentary Film Module Renee H. Shea Bowie State University Bowie, Maryland “Nonfiction is booming.” So begins an article in the National Council of Teachers of English’s The Council Chronicle. Indeed, nonfiction is gaining a stronger presence at nearly every level of education these days. Once the focus primarily of freshman English, nonfiction texts have become part and parcel of many high school textbooks; we hear of middle-school curricula being “infused” with nonfiction, and even the earlier grades are seeing more nonfiction texts in the English classroom.
Standardized testing may be driving some of this interest. Concern over boys’ declining interest in reading novels, especially those that focus on relationships, has also provoked exploration of this genre. We’ve recognized that nonfiction is rich, varied, and interesting, including the traditional belles lettres pieces as well as editorials, columnists, speeches, memoirs, letters, biographies, and pretty much any type of analysis—and argument. Although documentaries have sparked classroom interest as nonfiction claims more of our instructional time, we acknowledge them as an independent and celebrated art form on their own.
They are “texts” to be “read” as part of the development of overall literacy skills. They have the potential to engage students who live and learn in a world of visual stimuli. Not incidentally, they answer the call for differentiated learning as students approach them through avenues other than “reading,” and they match standards that call for critical viewing. Finally, although once the realm of the independent filmmaker, documentaries now have a broader, commercial appeal that has resulted in funding and festivals, such as the American Film Institute’s annual SILVERDOCS or Duke University’s Full Frame Documentary Film Festival.
Perhaps most important, documentary films can serve as a bridge to critical thinking, reading, and writing—essential literacy skills. As John Golden writes in his NCTE book Reading in the Reel World: Teaching Documentaries and Other Nonfiction Texts, “. [as] we are teaching our students how to ‘read’ documentary film, we are also giving them the tools and the ability to read nonfiction print texts.” The five articles in this module all suggest ways to bring documentary film into the classroom in creative, thoughtful ways. I’ve been using documentary in my freshman composition classes for a few years, but last spring I developed a full-scale approach to 1 Curriculum Module: Using Documentary Film as an Introduction to Rhetoric give my students a foundation in the basics of rhetoric.
In “Introducing Rhetorical Analysis Through Documentary Film,” I describe starting with An Inconvenient Truth and leading students to develop their own analysis of the rhetorical strategies filmmakers use to achieve their purpose: in other words, we read film as argument. (Now that Al Gore has won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize, this film might seem even more compelling, certainly more topical, but this honor would not change my approach.) On an even more specific level in “Introducing Style Analysis Through Documentary Film,” John Golden starts with this question: “What does writing style mainly come down to? Choice. Choices in words, phrases, tone, etc.” He explains the filmmaker’s choices of visual, audio, and text in documentary film as analogs to diction and then the connections between and among images, sound, and text as analog to syntax. Jennifer Pust focuses on “Recognizing Fallacies, Bias, and Visual Arguments in Popular Documentaries.” She defines fallacies as “not necessarily indicators of flawed logic, but rather.
attempts to move and/or manipulate the audience,” and offers examples from Super Size Me, Bowling for Columbine, and Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price. Christel turns to earlier work to explore “the distinctions between persuasion and propaganda.” She guides us through an examination of Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will, a text designed “to move the viewer to embrace Adolph Hitler as the embodiment of Germany’s political and economic revitalization in the mid-1930s.” Finally, John Brassil looks toward synthesis in his analysis of the recent documentary Why We Fight: “In effect, [director Eugene Jarecki] uses a wide array of visual and spoken source material to shape his argument.” John draws intriguing connections by examining Dwight D. Eisenhower’s 1961 Farewell Speech, which is one of the texts featured in the documentary. All of the experienced teachers writing these modules share their classroom instruction at the same time that they offer suggestions of documentaries that work well and sources that will help to enhance our understanding of this genre.
We hope this work deepens appreciation of documentary film, stimulates further conversation about documentaries and nonfiction, and leads to more effective and innovative classroom practices. “Documentaries: Another Way to Read.” The Council Chronicle. 2 Curriculum Module: Using Documentary Film as an Introduction to Rhetoric Introducing Rhetorical Analysis Through Documentary Film Renee H. Shea Nonfiction, visual culture, argument—these three essential components of reading and writing converge in documentary film, making it an ideal way to introduce students to the fundamentals of rhetoric.
What, after all, is a documentary except someone’s argument that the audience should accept this viewpoint, take this action, make this commitment, understand the rightness/wrongness of this policy, etc? To achieve this purpose, the filmmaker (or director) must understand the audience and appropriate appeals—i., the rhetorical situation. All in all, documentaries build on the visual world of our students while at the same time these nonfiction films focus on substantive, often controversial, issues that affect students’ lives. As anyone who’s passed through my classroom or workshops knows, I am devoted to Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” as the perfect introduction to rhetoric. It’s a textbook of strategies, a model of the classical Aristotelian triangle, and it works.
Yet, recently, I’ve turned to documentary film as a way to capitalize on my students’ interest in the visual and their prior knowledge of how images work. Further, since many documentaries involve research and presentation of a “case” or viewpoint, they invite students to engage in research while analyzing elements of rhetoric. With my primary objective being for students to gain an understanding of what a rhetorical situation is, I turned to Hepzibah Roskelly’s article on AP Central®, “What Do Students Need to Know About Rhetoric.” In that excellent essay, she explains the importance of “becoming conscious of how rhetoric works [to] transform speaking, reading, and writing, making us more successful and able communicators and more discerning audiences.” She argues that it’s not necessary to become familiar with lists of specialized terms but rather to understand a few key concepts. These include • the rhetorical triangle of speaker, audience, subject, and their interdependence • the context and purpose in which the speaking or writing occurs • appeals to logos, pathos, and ethos I broke these out a bit more specifically to add the following: • kairos • counterargument 3 Curriculum Module: Using Documentary Film as an Introduction to Rhetoric • types of evidence: facts, statistics, personal experience, expert testimony, humor, induction, and deduction For better or worse, during my initial forays into documentaries, I did minimal work with the language of film, pointing out basic techniques such as archival footage, juxtaposition, camera angles, and audio track.
Essentially, I wanted students to become critical viewers of the visual images, the audio track, and the verbal texts (whether as voice-over or words on the screen). The assignment freshman students wrote was a relatively brief (1,500 words) documented essay analyzing a film of their choice: In this essay, you will analyze the rhetoric of a documentary film, specifically its purpose, audience, persuasive appeals, and its effectiveness. Essentially, you are analyzing the argument that the filmmaker makes, how he or she develops it, and the extent to which he or she is successful in achieving the purpose. A major part of your grade on this essay (content and development) will be your understanding of how the filmmaker presents his or her case: e., through statistics, expert testimony, personal experience, humor, archival footage, sound track.
To introduce rhetorical analysis, I chose Al Gore’s Academy Award–winning film An Inconvenient Truth. Over several class periods, we watched (most of) the film, stopping frequently to discuss strategies Gore and Davis Guggenheim, the director, use to develop an argument. (It is worth noting that the study guides available online for classroom use stress the science and applications to science class but do not explore the rhetoric of the documentary itself.) An Inconvenient Truth served my purposes well for several reasons. First, I doubted that many of my students would choose this film on their own, and, teacher that I am, I felt it addressed a topic important to them.
Second, it is a well-crafted and skillfully executed example of the documentary genre. Third, it is open to interpretation: some claim that it is a siren call to do something about global warming; others see it as Gore’s siren call for a presidential nomination. We began at the beginning: that opening sequence with the idyllic nature scene, the pleasant music, the Thoreau-like reminder of nature as beauty, refuge, and spiritual inspiration. Following are notes on rhetorical features and strategies I called to students’ attention as we viewed the first 30 minutes of the film (in sequence): • Setting: An academic-looking lecture hall.
This setting emphasized the seriousness of the endeavor: Gore the “policy wonk” with his slide show. Students noted that this setting, returned to repeatedly throughout the film, stressed the importance of reason through association with a university setting. • Humor: He introduces himself with the self-effacing statement, “I’m Al Gore. I used to be the next president of the United States.” Students commented on the 4 Curriculum Module: Using Documentary Film as an Introduction to Rhetoric fact that he’s known as “kind of a nerd,” so it was easy to discuss ways in which Gore is establishing his credibility as a knowledgeable and serious person, but one who also has a sense of humor—i., he is establishing ethos.
Black-and-white footage of Gore during the presidential campaign is spliced in as he is introducing himself—and establishing ethos as an elected official as well as a concerned public citizen. Visual images, especially photographs are used to great advantage in this documentary, and students noted right away that the footage of belching smokestacks early on contrasted with the idyllic natural setting of the opening image. • Context of Hurricane Katrina. While some students claimed that the occasion—kairos—was the urgency of global warming, others pointed out the immediate occasion of Katrina claimed national attention for this issue.
With Gore’s face on the left, footage of Katrina fills the rest of the screen. Right before we see the actual title of the film, Gore states what is certainly one (and some might argue the only) purpose of the documentary: that it is time to make significant changes in response to the reality that global warming (or climate change) is not a political issue but an ethical or moral one. • Lots of logos.