The Effects of Event Depictions in Second Language Phrasal Vocabulary Learning Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktorin der Philosophie (Dr.) Eingereicht an der Sprach- und literaturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von Huong Thi Thu Nguyen, M. März 2021 Gutachter/Innen: 1. Natalia Gagarina Prof. Sabine Kunst Prof.
Stefan Kipf Präsidentin der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Dekan der Sprach- und literaturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät Acknowledgements My profound thanks go to my supervisor, Prof. Approximately five years ago, she gave me an opportunity and said that I would have a big adventure. I have not given up on the adventure because of her. She supported me whenever I met difficulties or needed advice or suggestions.
My work benefited hugely from her encouragement, scientific advice in developing my interests, understanding, and humanity. I am also very grateful to Dr. Katja Maquate for her help in my scientific and daily life. I want to thank Carsten Schliewe for his technical assistance.
My next special thanks go to Linh Thi Dieu Nguyen for recording the auditory stimuli in Vietnamese for all experiments. I acknowledge the financial support by the Vietnam International Education Development, Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training (Project 911). I enjoyed the collaborative and friendly atmosphere in the HU Psycholinguistic Lab, where I could always be sure to receive help when needed, and hence wish to thank the team: Katja Maquate, Dato Abshidze, Camilo Rodríguez Ronderos, Daniela Palleschi, and Aine Ito. I am also grateful to the psycholinguistic student assistants who have assisted with collecting image materials, recording stimuli, and analyzing IQ subtests: Luise Henneberg, Oleksandra Butenko, Melis Odabaş, and Minying Feng.
Finally, I wish to acknowledge my friends, my family, my husband, Viet Anh, and my daughter, Linh Giang, for their support and patience throughout the last five years. They kept me going on, and this work would not have been possible without their input. i Zusammenfassung In früheren Studien zum L2-Wortschatzerwerb wurden die Auswirkungen des visuellen Kontexts auf das Lernen und die Verarbeitung von Wörtern und Kollokationen in der L2 untersucht. Es wurde festgestellt, dass die Erstsprache einen positiven Transfer auf das Lernen einer Zweitsprache hat, wenn die Wörter Ähnlichkeiten aufweisen.
Darüber hinaus wurden die Einflüsse der kognitiven Fähigkeiten der Lernenden und ihres Erwerbsalters (AoA) auf das L2-Vokabellernen unter verschiedenen Bedingungen des L2- Vokabellernens festgestellt. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, die Auswirkungen des visuellen Kontexts und des Transfers auf das Lernen von L2-Vokabeln weiter zu untersuchen und zu klären, wie die kognitiven Fähigkeiten und das Erwerbsalter diese Auswirkungen in einem bestimmten L2-Lernkontext beeinflussen. Im Detail wurden Effekte der Ereignisdarstellung (d. nicht-sprachlicher visueller Kontext) untersucht sowie Transfereffekte aus der Erstsprache in die Zweitsprache im Bezug auf das Lernen von L2- Phrasenwortschatz (d.
Verb-Nomen-Phrasen) bei erwachsenen Anfängern. Wir führten Kurzzeitexperimente zum L2-Wortschatzerwerb durch, bei denen wir die Reaktionszeiten maßen. Zwei weitere Forschungsfragen untersuchten, ob es Zusammenhänge zwischen der AoA oder den kognitiven Fähigkeiten der Lernenden und ihrem Lernerfolg beim Vokabellernen in einer kurzfristigen L2-Lernumgebung gibt. Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass erwachsene L2-Anfänger*innen beim L2-Vokabellernen von visuellen Darstellungen profitierten: Sie waren unter Lernbedingungen mit Ereignissen genauer und schneller als unter Lernbedingungen ohne Ereignisse.
Diese Effekte konnten in drei Experimenten nicht nur mit jungen Erwachsenen im Alter von 18 bis 31 Jahren nachgewiesen werden, sondern galten auch für Erwachsene im frühen und späten mittleren Alter von 32 bis 65 Jahren. Die vorangegangene Forschung deutete darauf hin, dass die Ähnlichkeit zwischen L1 und L2 das L2-Lernen beeinflussen könnte, jedoch nicht in diesem spezifiscchen L2-Lernkontext. Darüber hinaus wurde der AoA der Probanden manipuliert, was dazu führte, dass junge Erwachsene in den kognitiven Tests und bei den L2-Lernaufgaben besser abschnitten als die anderen beiden Gruppen. Basierend auf den Ergebnissen unserer Forschung konnten wir herausfinden, welche Faktoren den Erfolg des L2-Wortschatzerwerbs bei erwachsenen L2-Anfängern stark beeinflussen und dass das Lernen von L2-Phrasenwortschatz mit dargestellten Ereignisfotos angewendet werden kann.
ii Abstract Previous studies of L2 vocabulary learning presented visual context effects on L2 word and collocation learning and processing. It was found that L1 has a positive transfer in L2 learning when words have similarities. Furthermore, the influences of learners‘ cognitive ability and their age of acquisition (AoA) in L2 vocabulary learning have been found in diverse L2 vocabulary learning conditions. The present dissertation aimed to further investigate the effects of visual context and transfer on L2 learning, as well as how cognitive ability and AoA influence any such effects in a particular L2 vocabulary learning context.
In detail, we investigated event depiction (i., non-linguistic visual context) effects and L1–L2 transfer effects on L2 phrasal vocabulary (i., verb-noun phrases) learning for adult beginners. We conducted short-term L2 vocabulary learning experiments during which we measured reaction times. Two other research questions examined whether there are relationships between learners‘ AoA or their cognitive ability and their L2 vocabulary learning success in a short-term L2 learning setting. Results showed adult L2 beginners benefited from visual depictions in L2 vocabulary learning: They were more accurate and faster in event-present learning conditions than in event-absent learning conditions.
These effects were not only replicated with young adults aged 18 to 31 in three experiments but they also extended to early and late middle-aged adults aged 32 to 65. The prior research suggested that the L1–L2 similarity might influence L2 learning, but not in our L2 learning context. In addition, the AoA of subjects was manipulated, which resulted in young adults performing in the cognitive test and L2 learning tasks best compared to the other two groups. Based on the findings of our research, we were able to identify which factors strongly influence L2 vocabulary learning success for L2 adult beginners, and whether L2 phrasal vocabulary learning with depicted event photographs can be applied.
iii Contents List of Figures. viii List of Tables. Second Language Vocabulary Learning and Assessment.1 Second Language Learning and Acquisition .1 Second Language and Foreign Language .2 Language Learning and Language Acquisition .2 Second Language Vocabulary Learning and Testing Tasks .1 Second Language Word Learning and Testing .2 Second Language Phrasal Vocabulary Learning and Processing. Depicted Objects and Depicted Actions: From Language Processing and Language Comprehension to Language Learning.
Language Transfer in Second Language Learning .1 Lexical Transfer: Definition and Types. Lexical Transfer: First Language–Second Language Vocabulary Correspondence and Differentiation .1 Lexical Transfer in Second Language Learning. Lexical Transfer in Second Language Processing. Age of Acquisition Related Differences in Second Language Learning.
Cognitive Performance of Second Language Learners .1 Design and Conditions .2 High-level Predictions. Second Language Vocabulary Learning with Suitable Testing .3 Experimental Design and Procedure .4 Predictions and Analysis Methods .5 Results and Discussion 1 .2 Reaction Time Results .3 Discussion for Experiment 1.4 Procedure and Predictions .5 Results and Discussion .2 Reaction Time Results .3 Discussion for Experiment 2.3 Second Language Vocabulary Testing and its Effects on Second Language Vocabulary Learning Success in Experiments 1 and 2. Influences of Individual Differences on Second Language Vocabulary Learning Success.1 Age Ranges for Adulthood .3 Results and Discussion .2 Reaction Time Results .3 Cognitive Test Results .4 Discussion for Experiment 2R .3 Early Middle-aged Adults (Experiment 3) .3 Results and Discussion .2 Reaction Time Results .4 Cognitive Test Results .5 Discussion for Experiment 3.4 Late Middle-Aged Adults (Experiment 4) .3 Results and Discussion .2 Reaction Time Results .3 Cognitive Test Results .4 Discussion for Experiment 4.5 Individual Differences of Adults aged from 18 to 65 and Second Language Vocabulary Learning Success .1 Comparisons of Cognitive Test Scores for Experiments 2R, 3, and 4 .2 Age Comparison for Experiments 2R, 3 and 4 .1 Predictions and Analysis Methods .1 Age and Cognitive Test Results.2 Age and Accuracy in Second Language Vocabulary Learning .3 Age and Reaction Time in Second Language Vocabulary Learning. Second Language Vocabulary Learning: Learning with Single Exposure and Learning with vs.
With Testing Part as a Factor in the Analysis Model. Without Testing Part in the Analysis Model .2 Reaction Time Results. With Testing Part as a Factor in the Analysis Model. With Testing Part as a Factor in the Analysis Model .3 Cognitive Test Results .5 Discussion for Experiment 2N .2 A Comparison between Experiments 2N and 2R.
General Discussion and Conclusion .1 Effects of Event Photographs in Second Language Phrasal Vocabulary Learning143 11.2 Second Language Transfer in the Specific Second Language Learning Situation 147 11.3 Age Differences in Second Language Vocabulary Learning Success .4 Learners‘ Cognitive Ability and their Second Language Vocabulary Learning Success. 168 vii List of Figures Figure 1: The word-based instruction and the picture-based instruction in L2 word learning. 11 Figure 2: Four learning conditions in Study 7 (adapted from Ong and Chan, 2019). Sequence of presentation for items on Lexical Decision Task (adapted from Wolter and Gyllstad, 2011).
Sequence of presentation for items (adapted from Yamashite and Jiang 2010). The procedure of the eye-tracking experiment (Münster, 2016). Contrastive analysis and L2 learning (adapted from Al-khresheh, 2016). 29 Figure 7: The Revised Hierarchical Model (adapted from Kroll and Stewart, 1994).
37 Figure 8: Example of testing display in Experiment 1. 58 Figure 9: Procedure in the main learning experiment (Experiment 1). 59 Figure 10: Accuracy in per learning condition in Experiment 1. 62 Figure 11: Reaction time in per learning condition in Experiment 1.
12: Part effect in Experiment 1. 64 Figure 13: The interaction between language mapping and part for RT in Experiment 1. 64 Figure 14: Examples of testing display in Part 1 and Part 3 of Experiment 2. 68 Figure 15: The procedure of Experiment 2 (also in Experiments 2R, 3 and 4).
69 Figure 16: The interaction between event photograph and testing part. 71 Figure 17: The effect of event photograph on the accuracy in Experiment 2. : The interaction between event photograph and testing part on the reaction time in Experiment 2 (error bars represent 95% CI) .: The interaction between language mapping and testing part on the reaction time in Experiment 2 (error bars represent 95% CI). : The interaction between event photograph and language mapping on the reaction time in Experiment 2 (error bars represent 95% CI).
75 Figure 19a: The interaction between event photograph and language mapping on the reaction time in Part 1/immediate testing of Experiment 2 (error bars represent 95% CI). 75 viii Figure 19b: The interaction between event photograph and language mapping on the reaction time in Part 3/delayed testing of Experiment 2 (error bars represent 95% CI). 76 Figure 20: The effect of event photograph on the reaction time in Experiment 2 (error bars represent 95% CI). 76 Figure 21: The interaction between event photograph and language mapping on the reaction time in Experiment 2 (error bars represent 95% CI).
77 Figure 22: The full procedure in the Lab for experiments 2R, 2N, 3, and 4. 83 Figure 23: The interaction between event photograph and testing part on the accuracy in Experiment 2R. 89 Figure 24: The interaction between event photograph and language mapping on the accuracy in Experiment 2R .: The effect of event photograph on the accuracy in Experiment 2R. 86 Figure 26a: The interaction between event photograph and part on the reaction time in Experiment 2R (error bars represent 95% CI).
88 Figure 26b: The interaction between language mapping and part on the reaction time in Experiment 2R (error bars represent 95% CI). 88 Figure 27: The effect of event photograph on the reaction time in Experiment 2R (error bars represent 95% CI). 89 Figure 28a: Cognitive test scores for the WAIS test (exp. The y-axis displays the percentage of correct answers averaged across participants.
The percentages are shown in the center of each bar. Note that the verbal fluency test scores are not depicted. Since the task was free naming, there is no upper limit that can be reached. 90 Figure 28b: No correlation between WAIS and accuracy scores (exp.