Cải thiện kỹ năng viết qua phản hồi đồng đẳng: Nhận thức của giáo viên và sinh viên năm hai ...

Chuyên ngành

Methodology

Người đăng

Ẩn danh

Thể loại

Thesis

2010

56
4
0

Phí lưu trữ

30 Point

Mục lục chi tiết

Acknowledgement

Abstract

Declaration

Lists of tables, figures and appendices

1. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1. The rationale of the study

1.2. Aims of the study and research questions

1.3. Scope of the study

1.4. Significance of the study

1.5. Methods of the study

1.6. Organization of the thesis

2. CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1. Definitions of feedback to students’ writing

2.2. Types of feedback to students’ writing

2.3. Advantages and disadvantages of doing peer written feedback in the teaching and learning of writing

2.4. Guiding principles for effective peer written feedback

2.5. Summary

3. CHAPTER 3: THE METHODOLOGY

3.1. The current situation of teaching and learning writing at HUBT

3.2. Data collection procedure

3.3. Data analysis procedure

3.4. Summary

4. CHAPTER 4: DATA PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION

4.1. Teachers’ perception on students’ written feedback

4.2. Teachers’ perception on the advantage of students’ written feedback

4.3. Teachers’ perception on the disadvantage of students’ written feedback

4.4. Students’ perception on peer written feedback

4.5. Students’ perceived difficulties in indicating the mistakes in their peers’ writing

4.6. Students’ perceived difficulties in providing suggestions for the mistakes in their peers’ writing

4.7. Students’ perception on the advantage of peer written feedback

4.8. Students’ perception on the disadvantage of students’ written feedback

4.9. Improvement of students’ writing after receiving peer written feedback

4.10. Implications of using peer written feedback in improving teaching and learning writing skill

4.11. Summary

5. CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION

5.1. Limitations of the study

5.2. Suggestions for further studies

References

Appendices

Luận văn thạc sĩ vnu ulis peer feedbank in improving writing skills perceptions of teachers and second year non english major students at hanoi university of business and technology