BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC DÂN LẬP HẢI PHÒNG ------------------------------- ISO 9001:2015 KHÓA LUẬN TỐT NGHIỆP NGÀNH: TIẾNG ANH Sinh viên : Vũ Thị Hồng Ngọc Giảng viên hướng dẫn : Th.S Khổng Thị Hông Lê HẢI PHÒNG - 2018 Luan van MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRANING HAIPHONG PRIVATE UNIVERSITY ----------------------------------- AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICIENCY OF TEACHING METHODS APPLIED IN ESL CLASSROOMS FOR PRIMARY STUDENTS IN HAIPHONG CITY GRADUATION PAPER Student : Vu Thi Hong Ngoc Class : NA1802 Supervisor : Khong Thi Hong Le, M.A HAI PHONG - 2018 Luan van BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC DÂN LẬP HẢI PHÒNG -------------------------------------- NHIỆM VỤ ĐỀ TÀI TỐT NGHIỆP Sinh viên: Vũ Thị Hồng Ngọc SV: 1412751095 Lớp: NA1803 Ngành: Ngoại ngữ Tên đề tài: An analysis of the efficiency of teaching methods applied in ESL classrooms for primary students in Haiphong city Luan van NHIỆM VỤ ĐỀ TÀI 1. Nội dung và các yêu cầu cần giải quyết trong nhiệm vụ đề tài tốt nghiệp (về lý luận, thực tiễn, các số liệu cần tính toán và các bản vẽ). Các số liệu cần thiết để thiết kế, tính toán. Địa điểm thực tập tốt nghiệp.
Luan van CÁN BỘ HƯỚNG DẪN ĐỀ TÀI TỐT NGHIỆP Người hướng dẫn thứ nhất: Họ và tên: Khổng Thị Hồng Lê Học hàm, học vị: Thạc sĩ Cơ quan công tác: Đại học Dân lập Hải Phòng Nội dung hướng dẫn: An analysis of the efficiency of teaching methods applied in ESL classrooms for primary students in Haiphong city Người hướng dẫn thứ hai: Họ và tên:. Học hàm, học vị:. Nội dung hướng dẫn:. Đề tài tốt nghiệp được giao ngày 06 tháng 11 năm 2018 Yêu cầu phải hoàn thành xong trước ngày 07 tháng 1 năm 2019 Đã nhận nhiệm vụ ĐTTN Đã giao nhiệm vụ ĐTTN Sinh viên Người hướng dẫn Hải Phòng, ngày .năm 2019 Hiệu trưởng GS.NGƯT Trần Hữu Nghị Luan van PHẦN NHẬN XÉT CỦA CÁN BỘ HƯỚNG DẪN 1.
Tinh thần thái độ của sinh viên trong quá trình làm đề tài tốt nghiệp: ……………………………………………………………………………. Đánh giá chất lượng của khóa luận (so với nội dung yêu cầu đã đề ra trong nhiệm vụ Đ.N trên các mặt lý luận, thực tiễn, tính toán số liệu…): ……………………………………………………………………………. Cho điểm của cán bộ hướng dẫn (ghi bằng cả số và chữ): ……………………………………………………………………………. Hải Phòng, ngày … tháng … năm Cán bộ hướng dẫn (Ký và ghi rõ họ tên) Luan van CỘNG HÒA XÃ HỘI CHỦ NGHĨA VIỆT NAM Độc lập - Tự do - Hạnh phúc PHIẾU NHẬN XÉT CỦA GIẢNG VIÊN HƯỚNG DẪN TỐT NGHIỆP Họ và tên giảng.
viên: Đơn vị công tác:. Họ và tên sinh viên:. Đề tài tốt nghiệp:. Nội dung hướng.
Tinh thần thái độ của sinh viên trong quá trình làm đề tài tốt nghiệp. Đánh giá chất lượng của đồ án/khóa luận (so với nội dung yêu cầu đã đề ra trong nhiệm vụ Đ.N trên các mặt lý luận, thực tiễn, tính toán số liệu…). Ý kiến của giảng viên hướng dẫn tốt nghiệp Được bảo vệ Không được bảo vệ Điểm hướng dẫn Hải Phòng, ngày … tháng … năm. Giảng viên hướng dẫn (Ký và ghi rõ họ tên) Luan van CỘNG HÒA XÃ HỘI CHỦ NGHĨA VIỆT NAM Độc lập - Tự do - Hạnh phúc PHIẾU NHẬN XÉT CỦA GIẢNG VIÊN CHẤM PHẢN BIỆN Họ và tên giảng viên:.
Họ và tên sinh viên:. Đề tài tốt nghiệp:. Phần nhận xét của giáo viên chấm phản biện. Những mặt còn hạn chế.
Ý kiến của giảng viên chấm phản biện Được bảo vệ Không được bảo vệ Điểm phản biện Hải Phòng, ngày … tháng … năm. Giảng viên chấm phản biện (Ký và ghi rõ họ tên) Luan van ACKNOWLEDGEMENT In the process of doing the graduation paper, I have received a lot of assistance, guidance and encouragement from my teachers, family and friends. First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest thanks to my research supervisor Ms. Khong Thi Hong Le, M.A, the lecturer of foreign language faculty, Haiphong Private University in every step throughout the process.
Without her invaluable suggestions and advice, this paper would have never been accomplished. I would also like to show my sincere gratitude to all the teachers of English department at Haiphong Private University for their help as well as useful lectures during my four-year university life at Haiphong Private University, which have been then the foundation and inspiration for my research paper. Most importantly, none of this could have happened without my family and my friends who fully supported me while I was doing this graduation paper. Every time I was ready to quit, they were always beside me and encouraged me and I am forever grateful.
This graduation paper stands as a testament to their unconditional love and encouragement. Hai Phong, October 2018 Vu Thi Hong Ngoc Luan van i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….i Table of contents……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….ii List of abbreviations……………………………………………………………………………………………………….iv List of tables……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Aims of the study …………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 3. Method of the study…………………………………………………………….
Scope of the study…………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 5. Design of the study…………………………………………………………………………. Development Chapter 1: Literature Review………………………………………………………. A brief of English language teaching methods and approaches in vietnam………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Features of english teaching methods and techniques applied in ESL classrooms………………………………………………………………………………………. Grammar translation method…………………………………………………………………………12 1. Audio-lingual method……………………………………………. Community language learning…………………………………………….
The silent way……………………………………………………………………………………………………. Communicative language teaching………………………………. English teaching methods in primary schools in Vietnam……………. Data collection instruments and procedure…………………….……21 Luan van ii 2.22 Chapter 3: Findings and discussion……………………………….
Implementation of grammar translation method…………………………. Implementation of audio-lingual method…………………………………………. Implementation of direct method…………………………………………………. Implementation of CLT.
Implementation of both direct method and CLT………………. Implementation of reading approach……………………………………………………. Statistics from the researcher’s observation……………………………………………31 3. Implications for teaching in ESL classrooms………………………….33 Part III: Conclusion 1.
Limitations of the study………………………………………………………………………. Recommendations for further study……………………………….40 Luan van iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ALM Audio-lingual method Certificate in Teaching English to CELTA Speakers of Other Languages CLL Community language learning CLT Communicative language teaching ESL English as second language GTM Grammar translation method MFP Meaning Form Pronunciation MOET Ministry of Education and Training Teaching English as a Foreign TEFL Language Teaching English to Speakers of Other TESOL Languages Luan van iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Statistics of Use of Grammar Translation Method Teaching grammar through MFP examples and drills rather than Table 2 providing grammar rules (Audio-lingual Method) Table 3 Statistics of Direct Method applied in class Table 4 Statistics of CLT methods applied in class Table 5 Variations in error correction techniques Table 6 Statistics of use of reading approach Table 7 Statistics from researcher’s observation Luan van v PART I INTRODUCTION 1. Rationale In the 21st century, countries from all over the world are tending to develop basing on international cooperation. English has become crucial to the way people interact with different people in the world; not being able to communicate in English imposes what seem to be formidable limitations.
Therefore, English has been adopted as one of the most important subjects in many schools, especially in primary schools in Vietnam. English has been taught mostly by Vietnamese teachers in public schools for many years in the traditional way, in which education was delivered through recitation and memorization techniques. However, Sonia Jackson who wrote an interesting blog post about modern teaching methods for Getting Smart states that the traditional ”chalk and talk” teaching method which has existed during the past hundred years is now requiring inferior results in comparison with modern teaching methods used in schools at present time. Undoubtedly, in ESL classrooms, the greater interaction among students is encouraged and the boundaries the authority are erased and the enjoyment over grades is put a great emphasis.
Recently, with the rising demand of being able to speak English fluently, many people have sent their children to English center where English is taught by ESL teachers. In ESL classrooms, whereas the modern way of doing things involves interactive methods, English is approached through participation in many fun classroom activities. Studying with playing will be much more effective than only focusing on the theories. In addition, the programs using music, games also help the lessons less boring.
English programs for children that should be combined with the introduction of short children's stories, songs, cartoons, games themed language. This makes a great contribution to encourage children to learn and become more confident in using English. Scholars such as Braine (2010) and Kirkpatrick (2010) have identified a perception in the English language teaching profession in East and Southeast Asia that native English- speaking teachers (NESTs) are the ideal model for language production. Their speech is held up as the gold standard of grammatical correctness and perfect 6 Luan van pronunciation (cf.
Wang, 2012), and they are valued as repositories of cultural information For that reason, the study was conducted with the aim of analyzing the efficiency of teaching methods applied in ESL classrooms on primary students in Haiphong. Aims of the study This paper is conducted with a view of finding out the efficiency of ESL teaching methods applied for primary students compared to traditional teaching in achieving the goal of learning English. This research is, therefore, expected to document the significant ways of teaching English language suitable for elementary level students and discuss the practical implementation of these ways. Two research questions were addressed as follow: What are common ESL teaching methods applied for primary schoolers? How efficient are teaching methods applied in ESL classrooms? 3.
Methods of the study Considering all the characteristics, this paper made great use of both quantitative and qualitative method. First, a quantitative took full advantage of using the structured questions where response options are predetermined and a large number of respondents are involved to explore the teaching techniques and methods applied in ESL classrooms. Second, a qualitative approach allowed the researcher to gather non-numerical data, which provided more opportunities for explorations after giving information. Through observation, the method did not limit the respondents’ input to a set of predetermined responses.
Scope of the study Studying the efficiency of ESL teaching methods on all elementary students in Haiphong city is immense, so the study cannot cover all the ESL classrooms in 7 Luan van Haiphong. Therefore, my study was mainly carried out ELS classrooms within ILA English Centre and the priority was given to ESL teachers at the centers. Design of the study This study is composed of three main parts: Part 1 is the introduction which consists of rationale, aims, study methods, the scope and design of the study. Part 2 is the development- the main part of this paper which is divided into four chapters : - Chapter one is theoretical background of different teaching methods applied in ESL classrooms.
- Chapter two shows detailed explanation of the methodology. - Chapter three indicates the efficiency of ESL teaching methods and gives useful teaching recommendations for ESL teachers in Haiphong city. Part 3 is the conclusion which summarizes what was given in previous parts as well as some limitations of the study and recommendations for further study. 8 Luan van PART II.
DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW 1. A brief of English language teaching methods and approaches in Vietnam It is difficult to point to a specific date when English was introduced into Vietnam. This history of English language teaching in Vietnam can be roughly divided into two periods: English in Viet Nam before 1986 and English in Viet Nam from 1986 up to the present. The reason for this way of division is that 1986 was the year when the Vietnamese Communist Party initiated its overall economic reform, exercising the open-door policy, and thus making English as the most important language in Vietnam.