Tác động của giảng dạy trực tuyến đến danh tính nghề nghiệp của giảng viên đại học

Trường đại học

University of Colorado

Chuyên ngành

Higher Education

Người đăng

Ẩn danh

Thể loại

thesis

2012

281
0
0

Phí lưu trữ

55 Point

Mục lục chi tiết

1. CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION

2. CHAPTER II: RELATED WORK

2.1. Online Teaching and Learning

2.2. Face-to-Face Learning

2.3. Blended/Hybrid Learning

2.4. Brief History of the Field

2.5. Online Learning in 2012

2.6. The Main Actors of Online Learning

2.7. Practical Barriers to Online Teaching

2.8. Pedagogy and Technology

2.9. Time Commitment and Compensation

2.10. Perceptions of Online Learning

2.11. Identity, Teaching Identity and Online Identity

2.12. The Social Construction of Identity

2.13. Importance of Teaching Identity

2.14. From Classroom to Online Identity

2.15. Embodied and Disembodied Identities

2.16. Online Teaching Selves

2.17. Identity Enactment Online

2.18. Technologies of Distance Learning

2.19. History of Distance Learning Technologies History

2.20. Garrisson and Anderson’s Model

2.21. The Course Management System

2.22. From Text to Virtual Reality

2.23. Text-Based Technologies

2.24. Audio-Based Technology

2.25. Video-Based Technology: Exploring Telepresence

2.26. Virtual Reality: Exploring Identity Construction

2.27. Limitations of Previous Work

3. CHAPTER III: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

3.1. Teaching Identity and Communities of Practice

3.2. Why Look at Teacher Identity?

3.3. Identities within Communities of Practice

3.4. Identity Challenges of the Transition to the Online Classroom

3.5. Challenges to Cores Values and Beliefs

3.6. Challenges to Traditional Modes of Enactments

3.7. Challenges to Professional Fulfillment

3.8. Dealing with Dissonance

4. CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND PILOT STUDY

4.1. The Choice of Mixed Methods

4.2. Research Strategy: Collective and Instrumental Case Studies

4.3. Characteristics and Selection

4.4. Data Collection and Recording

4.5. Audio-Visual Material

4.6. Data Analysis and Interpretation

4.7. Organization and Preparation of the Data

4.8. Findings and Discussion

4.9. Strategies for Findings Validation

4.10. Role of the Researcher

4.11. Triangulation of Sources

4.12. Presentation of Negative Findings

4.13. Quantitative Research Methods

4.14. Choice and Purpose of the Survey

4.15. Population and Sample

6. CHAPTER VI: CASE STUDY ONE

6.1. Case Study One Findings

6.2. Finding 1: Participants' Professional Identities are Dominated by Teaching Identities

6.3. Participants are Professionally Fulfilled Classroom Teachers

6.4. Participants’ Sources of Professional Fulfillment are Tied to the Face-to Face Nature of Classroom Teaching

6.5. Participants Have Mostly Stable Classroom Identities

6.6. Finding 2: Participants' Teaching Identities are Dominated by Classroom Teaching

6.7. Most Participants Prefer Face-to-Face Teaching

6.8. Few Participants Prefer Online or Report No Preference

6.9. Participants Find Online Teaching Time Consuming

6.10. Participants Report No Significant Difference Between their Classroom and Online Evaluations

6.11. Finding 3: Participants Teach Online for Practical Reasons

6.12. Participants Enjoy the Flexible Teaching Schedule

6.13. Participants Enjoy Being a Part of Something New

6.14. Participants Enjoy the Financial Incentives

6.15. Participants Enjoy Creating Access

6.16. Finding 4: Participants Encountered Significant Challenges but Made Minimal Adjustments to Their Online Teaching

6.17. Participants Struggled with Many Asynchronous and Non-F2F Aspects of Online Teaching

6.18. Participants Changed their Assessment Methods but Ported their Classroom Practices Online

6.19. Online Teaching Had an Impact on Participants’ Classroom Teaching Identities

6.20. Finding 5: Participants Have Fragmented Online identities

6.21. Participants Have Fragmented Online identities at the Pedagogical Level

6.22. Participants Have Fragmented Online Identities at the Persona Level

6.23. Finding 6: The Issues Experienced in the Online Classroom Have Negative Repercussions

6.24. Participants are Not Able to Use Familiar Teaching Practices Online

6.25. Participants are Not Able to Enact their Persona Online

6.26. The Constraints of the Online Classroom Have a Negative Impact on Students Expectations

6.27. Finding 7: Participants Hold Negative Beliefs about Online Education

6.28. Participants Believe Face-to-Face Teaching is Better

6.29. Participants Hold Negative Beliefs About Students’ Motivation to Study Online

6.30. Participants See Some Benefits in Online Teaching

6.31. Finding 8: Online Teaching Presents Affordances Aligned with Participants' Professional Identity

6.32. Finding 9: Participants Derive Limited Professional Fulfillment from Teaching Online

6.33. The Anonymity of the Online Classroom Hides Participants' Identity

6.34. Participants Derive Some Satisfaction from Online Courses

6.35. Finding 10: Participants are Moderately Engaged with Technology

6.36. Participants Use Traditionnal Technology in Class and the CMS Online

6.37. Participants Report Average Levels of Technological Self-Efficacy

6.38. Participants are Moderately Engaged with Technology

6.39. Participants Display Ambivalent Attitudes Towards Technology

6.40. Finding 11: Participants are Reluctant to Experiment with Technological Solutions

6.41. Case Study One Summary

7. CHAPTER VII: CASE STUDY TWO

7.1. Purpose of the Study

7.2. Case Study Two Findings

7.3. Finding 1: Participants Had Well-Developed Face-to-Face Teaching Identities

7.4. Participants Are Dedicated Classroom Teachers

7.5. Participants’ Sources of Fulfillment Are Tied to the Nature of Classroom Teaching

7.6. Participants’ Dissatisfaction Are Also Tied to the Nature of Classroom Teaching

7.7. Participants Have Stable Face-to-Face Teaching Identities

7.8. Finding 2: Participants Are Professionally Fulfilled by the Affordances of the Online Classroom

7.9. Participants’ Sources of Professional Fulfillment Tied to Unique Affordances of the Online Classroom

7.10. Finding 3: Participants Have Difficulty Reporting a Preference for One Modality

7.11. Participants Report Ambivalent Preferences

7.12. Finding 4: Participants Overcame the Challenges of the Online Classroom

7.13. Participants Transferred Their Content Online and Adjusted Their Teaching Practices

7.14. Participants Adjusted to the Time Commitment and Pace of Online Teaching

7.15. Participants Moved Beyond Text

7.16. Participants Overcame Technical Challenges

7.17. Participants Were Able to Create Community

7.18. Participants Resolved Academic Dishonesty Issues

7.19. Participants Overcame Negative Perception of Online Courses

7.20. Participants Still Face Unresolved Challenges

7.21. Finding 5: Face-To-Face and Online Teaching Are Similar at the Macro Level but Different at the Micro Level

7.22. Participants Are the Same Teachers at the Macro level

7.23. Participants are Different at the Micro Level

7.24. Online Teaching Had an Impact on Participants’ Face-to-Face Identity

7.25. Finding 6: The Support of the Community Plays a Determining Role in a Successful Transition Online

7.26. Participants Benefit from Institutional Support

7.27. Participants Benefit from Faculty Support

7.28. Participants Benefit from Faculty Collaboration

7.29. Finding 7: Case Study Two Participants Were Intrinsically Proud of their Online Teaching

7.30. Participants Are Intrinsically Proud To Teach Online

7.31. Participants Received Negative Feedback from the Public

7.32. Participants Believe that Online Teaching is Stigmatized

7.33. Finding 8: Participants Held Positive Views of Online Teaching and Learning

7.34. Participants Believe in the Benefits of Online Learning

7.35. Participants’ Views of the Risks and Issues of Online Education

7.36. Participants Blame the Lack of Training for the Negative Perceptions of Online Education

7.37. Participants Blame Low Quality Programs for the Negative Perceptions of Online Education

7.38. Finding 9: Case Study Two Participants Used Traditional Technologies in the Classroom and Emerging Technologies Online

7.39. Participants Reported Moderate Levels of Technological Self-Efficacy

7.40. Participants Used Traditional Technology in the Classroom

7.41. Participants Used Non-Traditional Technologies in the Online Environment

7.42. Participants Reported Ambivalent Attitudes Towards Use of Synchronous Tools

7.43. Finding 10: Technology Played a Determining Role in Teaching Identity Growth

7.44. Participants Displayed General Signs of Engagement with Technology

7.45. Participants Displayed a Pioneer Spirit and Attitude Towards Technology

7.46. Participants Displayed a Pragmatic, Realistic and Positive Attitude Towards Technology

7.47. Participants Used “Bricolage” Strategies to Solve Many of the Issues Encountered Online

7.48. Finding 11: Participants Were Not Able to Solve All the Issues Encountered

7.49. Participants Had Issues with the CMS

7.50. Participants Reported Non CMS-Related Technical Issues

7.51. Four Participants Are Satisfied with the Technology

7.52. Case Study Two Summary and Discussion

8. CHAPTER VIII: DO THE CASE STUDY RESULTS GENERALIZE?

8.1. Summary of Survey Results

8.2. Factors Impacting Professional Fulfillment And Enjoyment Online

8.3. Impact of Classroom Experience

8.4. Impact of Online Experience

8.5. The Role of Beliefs

8.6. Impact of the Community

8.7. Overall Comparison Between Attitude and Community Support

8.8. The Role of Training and Professional Development Efforts

8.9. The Role of Colleagues and Supervisors

8.10. The Role of Technology

8.11. The Use of Additional tools

8.12. Satisfaction with the CMS

9. CHAPTER IX: CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK

9.1. Contribution of this Research

APPENDICES

A. APPENDIX A: CASE STUDY ONE AND TWO CONSENT FORMS

B. APPENDIX B: INTERVIEW PROTOCOL ONE

C. APPENDIX C: INTERVIEW PROTOCOL TWO

D. APPENDIX D: CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PROTOCOL

E. APPENDIX E: ONLINE COURSE OBSERVATION PROTOCOL

F. APPENDIX F: ONLINE COURSE ARTIFACTS COLLECTED FOR CASE STUDY 2

G. APPENDIX G: CASE STUDY ONE CODE BOOK

H. APPENDIX H: CASE STUDY TWO CODE BOOK

I. APPENDIX I: STUDY THREE CONSENT FORM

J. APPENDIX J: STUDY THREE SURVEY

The impact of online teaching on higher education faculty