Luận Văn Thạc Sĩ: Phân Tích Đối Chiếu Việc Sử Dụng Trạng Ngữ Tình Thái Như Một Công Cụ Giảm Nhẹ ...

2012

73
0
0

Phí lưu trữ

30 Point

Mục lục chi tiết

LISTS OF FIGURES AND TABLES

1. CHAPTER 1: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

1.1. Notion and classification of speech acts

1.2. SPEECH ACT OF CRITICIZING

1.3. FACE AND POLITENESS

1.3.1. What is FACE?

1.3.2. What is POLITENESS?

1.4. Hedging from the point of view of pragmatics

1.5. Hedging as both positive and negative politeness

1.6. Types of disjuncts

2. CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1. PRE-CRITICIZING HEDGING

2.2. THE PREVIOUS STUDIES ON CRITICIZING

2.3. PREVIOUS STUDIES ON DISJUNCTS AS HEDGES FROM PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVE

2.4. RESEARCH APPROACH - CA

2.5. DATA COLLECTION METHOD: SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

2.6. DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENT

2.7. DATA COLLECTING PROCEDURES

2.8. DATA ANALYSIS UNITS/ PARAMETERS

4. CHAPTER 4: DATA ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

4.1. USE OF DISJUNCTS SEEN FROM COMMUNICATING PARAMETERS

4.2. USE OF DISJUNCTS SEEN FROM INFORMANTS’ PARAMETERS

APPENDIX A. Survey questionnaire

APPENDIX B. Examples of hedges

PART I: INTRODUCTION

1.1. Rationale

1.2. Scope of the study

1.3. Aims of the study

1.4. Objectives of the study

1.5. Research questions

1.6. Methodology

1.7. Design of the study

1.7.1. Part I: Introduction

1.7.2. Part II: Development

1.7.2.1. Chapter 1: Theoretical background and Literature review
1.7.2.2. Chapter 2: Hedging before criticizing
1.7.2.3. Chapter 3: Methodology
1.7.2.4. Chapter 4: Data analysis and findings

1.7.3. Part III: Conclusion

PART II: DEVELOPMENT

PART III: CONCLUSION

3.1. Review of the study

3.2. Implications of the study

3.3. Limitations of the study

3.4. Suggestions for further study

Luận văn thạc sĩ vnu ulis a contrastive analysis of moderating criticism the use of disjuncts as mitigating hedges in verbal communication