Sustained Product Innovation in Small Companies through the Lens of Absorptive Capacity A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Anthony Aitken Petley B.) UNSW School of Economics Finance and Marketing College of Business RMIT University September, 2019 i Declaration I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of the author alone; the work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; the content of the thesis is the result of work which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program; any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged; and, ethics procedures and guidelines have been followed. I acknowledge the support I have received for my research through the provision of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Anthony Aitken Petley Date: September, 2019 ii Acknowledgements Firstly, I acknowledge all those who work with passion, commitment, to continuously improve what they do and how they do it. My thanks to my supervisors, Professor Mike Reid and Associate Professor Angela Dobele, for their guidance through this journey.
My special thanks to Mike for accepting me as a candidate after I had been so long away from academic studies, and for enabling me to study in my area of interest in small companies. Thanks to my daughter Sam, who challenged me to take on this doctoral challenge, and for her encouragement throughout. My thanks to her also for enabling my involvement throughout this journey with her children, Cael and Nina, who give me the greatest joy. Finally, my thanks to my second daughter, Jenny, for her invaluable help with formatting and proof reading, and for the support and encouragement every day.
iii Preamble The purpose of this PhD is to investigate how a significant part of the Australian economy, namely small manufacturing companies, acquire and use knowledge, and succeed in product innovation (PI). Using Absorptive Capacity (ACAP) as the primary lens, it explores the actions, capabilities and processes used to recognise, acquire, assimilate, transform and exploit new knowledge for commercialisation of new products; and the factors which impact on successful and sustained PI. It aims to provide an improved understanding of how ACAP manifests in small companies particularly during the front-end of the PI process, and how it and the key moderating factors impact on this process. The study provides suggestions on how the success and sustainability of product innovation in small companies might be improved and the role ACAP can play in this process.
The research will follow the “thesis structured by papers” model, where chapters will be in the form of four papers that are in the process of being prepared for publication (being formatted, publication ready, submitted, accepted or published). The university does not require these chapters (papers) to have been submitted for publication nor accepted prior to the submission of the thesis. The thesis document is built around three studies which provide the data for these chapters (papers), with an introduction outlining the context of the work and introducing the overarching research questions. The final chapter draws together the four chapters (papers), discusses the contributions, limitations and implications of the work and offers final conclusions and recommendations.
iv Contents Abstract 1 Chapter 1 – Introduction 3 • Introduction, Context and Research Questions 3 • Philosophical Considerations 8 • Data Collection and Analysis 10 • Thesis Structure 12 • Executive Summaries, Chapters 2-5 12-16 Chapter 2 – The Front End of Sustained Product Innovation in Small Companies using ACAP as Lens: An Exploratory Study 17 • Abstract 17 • Introduction 18 • Theoretical Background 21 • Methodology, Sampling, Data Collection and Analysis 27 • Results 30 • Discussion 41 • Conclusions 42 • Limitations, Potential Implications, and Recommendations for Future Research 43 Chapter 3 – How Alternative Innovation Approaches impact on the Front-End to achieve Sustained Product Innovation in Small Companies 47 • Abstract 47 • Theoretical Background 48 • Methodology, Sampling, Data Collection and Analysis 59 • Results 62 • Discussion 68 • Conclusions, Implications and Recommendations 71 Chapter 4 – How small companies conduct relationships with others to overcome resource deficiencies, develop their ACAP capability and improve product innovation 74 • Abstract 74 • Introduction 75 • Theoretical Background 78 • Methodology, Sampling, Data Collection and Analysis 88 • Results 92 • Discussion 99 • Conclusions, Implications and Recommendations 104 v Chapter 5 – ACAP, FEI and Sustained Product Innovation – a quantitative study of small food manufacturing companies 108 • Abstract 108 • Introduction 109 • Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Development 112 • Methodology 121 • Results 122 • Discussion 127 • Conclusions, Implications and Recommendations 132 Chapter 6 – Summary, Conclusions and Future Research 135 • Introduction 135 • Conclusion 142 • Contributions to Research (Theory) 143 • Contributions to Practice 146 • Limitations 148 • Future Research 149 • Final Comments 151 APPENDIX 1 ETHICS NOTICES OF APPROVAL 153 APPENDIX 2 COMPANY INTERVIEW GUIDE 155 APPENDIX 3 EXTERNAL SOURCE INTERVIEW GUIDE 159 APPENDIX 4 QUANTITATIVE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE 161 APPENDIX 5 FACTOR LOADINGS 170 REFERENCES 178 vi List of tables Table 2.1 – Summary of Companies Interviewed 30 Table 2.2 – Summary of Company Interview Findings 40 Table 3.1 – PI in Small Companies and the role of ‘closed’ IAs 58 Table 3.2 – Summary of Companies Interviewed 62 Table 3.3 – Knowledge processes, resources, and alternative IAs to FEI in participating small companies 64-65 Table 3.4 – Examples of alternative IAs taken by participants 67 Table 4.1 – Key Literature on Engagement, Collaboration and Open Innovation, and FEI in small companies 86-87 Table 4.2 – Summary of Companies Interviewed 91 Table 4.3 – Summary of External Sources Interviewed 92 Table 4.4 – Stakeholder Engagement 93 Table 4.5 – Knowledge processes, resources, collaboration and open innovation in FEI 94-95 Table 4.6 – Examples of Collaboration and OI projects by participating companies 96 Table 5.1 – Reliabilities and Validities of Composite Factors 123 Table 5.2 – Correlation Matrix 124 Table 5.3 – Independent t- tests (95% confidence level) 125 Table 5.4 – Linear Regression Analysis 126 List of figures Figure 1.1 – Thesis Structure 12 Figure 2.1 – Framework to Study ACAP and FEI 26 Figure 3.1 – Overview of FEI and SPI and the role of IAs 71 Figure 4.1 – Conceptual model of Collaboration in FEI and SPI 104 Figure 5.1 – Conceptual Model of FEI/SPI Factors 113 Figure 5.2 – Results - Relationships between Composite Factors 127 vii Abstract Innovation is universally accepted as critical to economic growth, and small companies are recognised as key sources of innovation. Despite the plethora of government programmes to encourage innovation, Australia chronically ranks at the bottom of OECD countries with respect to commercialising innovation, particularly by small companies. Small companies provide the livelihood of many families, and are at the core of many communities and industries, so it is critical to understand how small companies function, and how they can improve performance. They are characteristically resource deficient, so how do some overcome this shortcoming to sustain product innovation and grow? This study conducts qualitative and quantitative research into the ability of small companies to acquire and exploit new knowledge (absorptive capacity) and how this capability together with organisational processes, resources, capabilities and characteristics influence the front-end of the product innovation process; and how this in turn impacts on successful and sustained product innovation, in the context of small food manufacturing companies in Australia.
The food industry currently adds value of A$26 billion to the Australian economy each year, and together with agriculture the food sector has been selected for strategic national development in Australia. The findings suggest that absorptive capacity (ACAP) plays a central role in influencing activities at the front end of innovation (FEI), and both directly and indirectly in successfully achieving sustained product innovation (SPI). The research also finds that the individual ACAP, entrepreneurial passion and innovation leadership of the owner-manager of a small company play major roles in the success of FEI, together with the organisation’s culture. The results indicate that small companies, while being active seekers of new knowledge typically utilise a limited scope of sources and use primarily ‘closed’ approaches, particularly bricolage, in product innovation.
Similarly, the research indicated that small companies have a limited scope of engagement with external stakeholders, and they rarely participate in collaborative innovation. This lack of engagement and collaboration is most evident between small companies and technical 1 institutions and potentially contributes to lower levels of novelty of product innovations by these companies. It is argued that building understanding, confidence and trust between small companies and technical institutions will require structural and attitude changes to enable higher levels of success through collaborative innovation. The findings of this research have implications for academics.
These include further research into the role of ACAP in small companies within other sectors, into how ACAP can influence FEI over time as the size of a company grows, into how to improve the scope and depth of external engagement by small companies, and into how the issues impeding small company-university collaboration on product innovation can be overcome. From a practitioner’s perspective, the findings provide insight into the importance of developing ACAP within a small company; into the complex inter-relationships of the organisation’s characteristics and capabilities particularly in the front-end of the innovation process, and the need for owner- managers to develop and manage these as a necessary part of growing the company successfully and sustainably. For policy makers the findings can provide guidance on appropriate platforms and programmes to encourage and support greater product innovation in small companies in Australia. 2 Chapter 1 – Introduction Introduction, Context and Research Questions The main objective of this research is to examine how small companies acquire and use new knowledge in the front-end of innovation (FEI) to successfully achieve Sustained Product Innovation (SPI).
The research uses Absorptive Capacity (ACAP) as a primary lens and considers its relationship with Dynamic Capabilities (DCs) within the paradigm of the Resourced Based View of the firm (RBV), in view of the resource deficiencies common in small companies. The research focusses on the front-end of the innovation process (FEI), and on small manufacturing companies, as seekers of information to enable product innovation, while also obtaining insight from external agencies in their capacity as potential knowledge providers to small companies. This focus on a discrete cohort, namely small companies in the Australian food manufacturing sector, addresses calls for better understanding of how sustained product innovation is achieved (Koryak et al., 2015), of how the small company sector innovates (Hutchinson and Quintas, 2008; Buenechea-Elberdin, 2017), and for more sector specific research (De Massis et al. The research follows a mixed method approach guided by a pragmatist paradigm to develop further understanding of product innovation applicable to small companies, and reflects this in a new model of SPI.
ACAP was established as a framework in which actions related to knowledge could be studied, and is defined as the ability of a firm to recognise the value of new external information (knowledge), assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990). Under RBV, competitive success is driven by the ability of firms to develop new knowledge-based capabilities that create core competencies (Pemberton and Stonehouse, 2000), and this is important in sustained innovation (Paradkar et al. Zahra & George (2002) defined a firm’s ACAP as one of a company’s dynamic capabilities and a critical resource. Research has concluded that 3 effectively managing the front-end of the product innovation process (FEI) is one of the most important challenges facing companies (Kim and Wilemon, 2002).
The front-end activities, include market vision and strategy, and the communication of these; the identification and assessment of opportunities; idea generation; product and project definition and planning (Khurana and Rosenthal, 1998; Kim and Wilemon, 2002).