Báo Cáo Tự Đánh Giá AUN-QA Của Sinh Viên Kế Toán Đặng Đình Tân - Ông Văn Năm

Chuyên ngành

Accounting

Người đăng

Ẩn danh

2021

104
0
0

Phí lưu trữ

30.000 VNĐ

Mục lục chi tiết

1. PART 1: INTRODUCTION

2. PART 2: AUN-QA CRITERIA

2.1. CRITERION 1 – THE EXPECTED LEARNING OUTCOMES

2.1.1. The expected learning outcomes have been clearly formulated and aligned with the vision and mission of the university

2.1.2. The expected learning outcomes cover both subject specific and generic (i. transferable) learning outcomes

2.1.3. The expected learning outcomes clearly reflect the requirements of the stakeholders

2.2. CRITERION 2 – PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

2.2.1. The information in the programme specification is comprehensive and up-to-date

2.2.2. The information in the course specification is comprehensive and up-to- date

2.2.3. The programme and course specifications are communicated and made available to the stakeholders

2.3. CRITERION 3 - PROGRAMME STRUCTURE AND CONTENT

2.3.1. The curriculum is designed based on constructive alignment with the expected learning outcomes

2.3.2. The contribution made by each course to achieve the expected learning outcomes is clear

2.3.3. The curriculum is logically structured, sequenced, integrated and up-to- date

2.4. CRITERION 4 - TEACHING AND LEARNING APPROACH

2.4.1. The educational philosophy is well articulated and communicated to all stakeholders

2.4.2. Teaching and learning activities are constructively aligned to the achievement of the expected learning outcomes

2.4.3. Teaching and learning activities enhance life-long learning

2.5. CRITERION 5 - STUDENT ASSESSMENT

2.5.1. The student assessment is constructively aligned to the achievement of the expected learning outcomes

2.5.2. The student assessments including timelines, methods, regulations, weight distribution, rubrics and grading are explicit and communicated to students

2.5.3. Methods including assessment rubrics and marking schemes are used to ensure validity, reliability and fairness of student assessment

2.5.4. Feedback of student assessment is timely and helps to improve learning

2.5.5. Students have ready access to appeal procedure

2.6. CRITERION 6 - ACADEMIC STAFF QUALITY

2.6.1. Academic staff planning (considering succession, promotion, re-planning, termination, and retirement) is carried out to fulfil the needs for education, research and service

2.6.2. Staff-to-student ratio and workload are measured and monitored to improve the quality of education, research and service

2.6.3. Recruitment and selection criteria including ethics and academic freedom for appointment, planning and promotion are determined and communicated

2.6.5. Training and developmental needs of academic staff are identified and activities are implemented to fulfil them

2.6.6. Performance management including rewards and recognition is implemented to motivate and support education, research and service

2.6.7. The types and quantity of research activities by academic staff are established, monitored and benchmarked for improvement

2.7. CRITERION 7 - SUPPORT STAFF QUALITY

2.7.1. Support staff planning (at the library, laboratory, IT facility and student services) is carried out to fulfil the needs for education, research and service

2.7.2. Recruitment and selection criteria for appointment, planning and promotion are determined and communicated

2.7.3. Competences of support staff are identified and evaluated

2.7.4. Training and developmental needs of support staff are identified and activities are implemented to fulfil them

2.7.5. Performance management including rewards and recognition is implemented to motivate and support education, research and service

2.8. CRITERION 8 - STUDENT QUALITY AND SUPPORT

2.8.1. The student intake policy and admission criteria are defined, communicated, published, and up-to date

2.8.2. The methods and criteria for the selection of students are determined and evaluated

2.8.3. There is an adequate monitoring system for student progress, academic performance, and workload

2.8.4. Academic advice, co-curricular activities, student competition, and other student support services are available to improve learning and employability

2.8.5. The physical, social and psychological environment is conducive for education and research as well as personal well-being

2.9. CRITERION 9 - FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

2.9.1. The teaching and learning facilities and equipment (lecture halls, classrooms, project rooms, etc.) are adequate and updated to support education and research

2.9.2. The library and its resources are adequate and updated to support education and research

2.9.3. The laboratories and equipment are adequate and updated to support education and research

2.9.4. The IT facilities including e-learning infrastructure are adequate and updated to support education and research

2.9.5. The standards for the environment, health, and safety; and access for people with special needs are defined and implemented

2.10. CRITERION 10 - QUALITY ENHANCEMENT

2.10.1. Stakeholders’ needs and feedback serve as input to curriculum design and development

2.10.2. The curriculum design and development process is established and subjected to evaluation and enhancement

2.10.3. The teaching and learning processes and student assessment are continuously reviewed and evaluated to ensure their relevance and alignment

2.10.4. Research output is used to enhance teaching and learning

2.10.5. Quality of support services and facilities (at the library, laboratory, IT facility and student services) is subjected to evaluation and enhancement

2.10.6. The stakeholder’s feedback mechanisms are systematic and subjected to evaluation and enhancement

2.11. Additional indicators

2.11.1. The pass rates and dropout rates are established, monitored and benchmarked for improvement

2.11.2. The average time to graduate is established, monitored and benchmarked for improvement

2.11.3. Employability of graduates is established, monitored and benchmarked for improvement

2.11.4. The types and quantity of research activities by students are established, monitored and benchmarked for improvement

2.11.5. The satisfaction levels of stakeholders are established, monitored and benchmarked for improvement

3. PART 3: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES ANALYSIS

3.1. Self-assessment results

3.2. List of evidence

Báo Cáo Tự Đánh Giá AUN-QA Của Đặng Đình Tân - Cử Nhân Kế Toán Ông Văn Năm là một tài liệu quan trọng, cung cấp cái nhìn chi tiết về quá trình tự đánh giá chất lượng đào tạo theo tiêu chuẩn AUN-QA. Tài liệu này không chỉ giúp người đọc hiểu rõ hơn về các tiêu chí đánh giá mà còn chia sẻ kinh nghiệm thực tế trong việc áp dụng AUN-QA vào chương trình đào tạo kế toán. Đây là nguồn tham khảo hữu ích cho các cá nhân và tổ chức đang hướng tới nâng cao chất lượng giáo dục đại học.

Để mở rộng kiến thức về chủ đề này, bạn có thể tham khảo Kỷ yếu hội thảo cấp trường đổi mới chương trình đào tạo ngành kiểm toán hướng kiểm toán nhằm đáp ứng các tiêu chuẩn AUN-QA, tài liệu này đi sâu vào việc đổi mới chương trình đào tạo để đáp ứng các yêu cầu quốc tế. Ngoài ra, Luận án tiến sĩ đảm bảo chất lượng đào tạo của các trường đại học tư thục tại thành phố Hồ Chí Minh theo AUN-QA cung cấp góc nhìn chuyên sâu về việc áp dụng AUN-QA trong bối cảnh cụ thể. Cuối cùng, Luận văn thạc sĩ tác động của việc đánh giá cấp chương trình đào tạo theo bộ tiêu chuẩn AUN-QA sẽ giúp bạn hiểu rõ hơn về tác động của quá trình đánh giá này đối với các trường đại học.

Mỗi tài liệu là một cơ hội để bạn khám phá sâu hơn về AUN-QA và cách thức áp dụng hiệu quả trong giáo dục đại học.